These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5491160)

  • 1. Presbyacusis. V. Filtered speech test.
    Palva A; Jokinen K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1970 Oct; 70(4):232-41. PubMed ID: 5491160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Presbyacusis. IV. Forward vs. reverse frequency sweep audiometry.
    Jokinen K; Kärjä J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1970 Oct; 70(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 5491159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating speech threshold from the PI-PB function.
    Jerger S; Jerger J
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Aug; 102(8):487-96. PubMed ID: 942326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Hearing changes by age].
    Kimura Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1972 Feb; 75(2):170-90. PubMed ID: 5062621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Directional audiometry. IV. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech in aided and unaided patients with monaural hearing loss.
    Tonning FM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1972 Jan; 73(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 5061256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Presbyacusis. I. Comparison of manual and automatic thresholds.
    Jokinen K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1969 Oct; 68(4):327-35. PubMed ID: 5373621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations.
    Aniansson G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distorted speech audiometry. A methodological and clinical study.
    Korsan-Bengtsen M
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1973; 310():1-75. PubMed ID: 4521066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Directional audiometry. VI. Directional speech audiometry in patients with practical deafness in one ear and impaired hearing in the other ear treated with hearing aids.
    Tonning FM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1972 Sep; 74(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 5080253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical and social aspects of speech audiometry. A comparative study of various speech audiometric materials].
    Parving A; Barfod J; Salomon G
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1976 Jan; 138(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 1251486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential intensity sensitivity and clinical masking.
    Blegvad B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1969 Apr; 67(4):428-34. PubMed ID: 5371325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patterns of puretone loss in presbycusis. A sequential study.
    Dayal VS; Nussbaum MA
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1971 May; 71(5):382-4. PubMed ID: 5093633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaural attenuation characteristics in audiometry.
    Snyder JM
    Laryngoscope; 1973 Nov; 83(11):1847-55. PubMed ID: 4758145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of subtle mid-frequency auditory dysfunction upon speech discrimination in noise.
    Findlay RC; Denenberg LJ
    Audiology; 1977; 16(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 880129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audiologic evaluation in cochlear and eighth nerve disorders.
    Sanders JW; Josey AF; Glasscock ME
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1974 Oct; 100(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 4369798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Undistorted and filtered speech audiometry in children with normal hearing.
    Palva A; Jokinen K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(5-6):383-8. PubMed ID: 1202913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiometric configuration and prediction of threshold for spondees.
    Carhart R; Porter LS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Sep; 14(3):486-95. PubMed ID: 5163882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship of auditory distortion test results to speech discrimination through flat vs. selective amplifying systems.
    Thompson G; Lassman F
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Sep; 12(3):594-606. PubMed ID: 5811850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds.
    Klein AJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3422-30. PubMed ID: 8326068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing loss and caloric response in Menière's disease. A comparative study.
    Enander A; Stahle J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1969 Jan; 67(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 5373617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.