These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5491829)
21. [Examination as an adequate criterion of evaluation of specialist training]. Ruzyllo E Pol Tyg Lek; 1968 Oct; 23(43):1660-2. PubMed ID: 5703508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Learning handicaps in medical education: dogmatic thinking--mass studies--examination orientation--ideological-dialectic filtration]. Bochnik HJ; Buchholz G; Richtberg W Med Welt; 1983 Sep; 34(36):959-66. PubMed ID: 6633220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The OSCE: a new challenge to the evaluation system in Korea. Lee YM; Ahn DS Med Teach; 2006 Jun; 28(4):377-9. PubMed ID: 16807181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The use of multiple choice questions in medical examination: an evaluation of scoring and analysis of results. Ho TF; Yip WC; Tay JS Singapore Med J; 1981 Dec; 22(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 7336210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Part II examination: more thoughts. Digney D CMAJ; 1994 May; 150(10):1540. PubMed ID: 8174019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Part II examination: more thoughts. Ray J CMAJ; 1994 May; 150(10):1541. PubMed ID: 8174020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The Part II examination: effect on IMGs. Cherian T CMAJ; 1995 Jan; 152(2):147-8. PubMed ID: 7820786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Normative notation. How to determine succes at an examination?]. Risse RJ; Barrès G Nouv Presse Med; 1977 Apr; 6(13):1151-3. PubMed ID: 850638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Looking for examiners for the final nursing examination]. Sygeplejersken; 1982 May; 82(18):17. PubMed ID: 6920885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Progress assessment of medical competence as a (national) physicians' examination?]. Essed GG Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Nov; 139(45):2317-21. PubMed ID: 7501067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Part II examination: content will out. Rashiq S CMAJ; 1995 Jan; 152(2):148. PubMed ID: 7695739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Break with a good examination tradition]. Nielsen IL; Packness A Sygeplejersken; 1989 May; 89(22):16. PubMed ID: 2763101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Objective procedural clinical examination (OPCE) for assessing competence of medical and dental students in practical skills. Adeyemi-Doro HO East Afr Med J; 1984 Jun; 61(6):477-81. PubMed ID: 6545189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Examination--myths and realities]. Brodal P Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Feb; 117(4):489-90. PubMed ID: 9148442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Methods in the evaluation of medical students]. Tscherning T; Christensen HC; Bilde A; Thomsen HS; Jaszczak PP Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 Jan; 161(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 9922683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Oral examination: a model for its use within a clinical clerkship. Vu NV; Johnson R; Mertz SA J Med Educ; 1981 Aug; 56(8):665-7. PubMed ID: 7265146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Teaching aids in basic clinical sciences (4): multiple choice questions as a teaching aid and form of examination]. Fredriksson E; Friberg U Lakartidningen; 1971 Jun; 68(27):3135-9. PubMed ID: 5569259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [The structured objective clinical examination. An instrument for the evaluation of competence]. de los Santos AR; Bernabó JG Medicina (B Aires); 1991; 51(6):568-72. PubMed ID: 7476113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]