These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5492631)

  • 21. British government support for research and development--a system in flux and under stress.
    Hess SL; Leonard JM
    Fed Proc; 1973 Feb; 32(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 4688653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. UK charities pick up the tab left by government shortfall.
    Hadlington S
    Nature; 1987 Jul 9-15; 328(6126):99. PubMed ID: 3600797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The future of medical research in Canada.
    Hollenberg MJ
    CMAJ; 1990 Apr; 142(8):805-7. PubMed ID: 2322911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Role of government and public organizations in conducting oncological research in Great Britain].
    Kiselev AK
    Vopr Onkol; 1978; 24(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 581013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. OST rows with tide in report on intellectual property.
    Mundell I
    Nature; 1992 Sep; 359(6393):264. PubMed ID: 1406924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Another tough year for MRC.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1991 Feb; 349(6310):552. PubMed ID: 2000125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The organization of postgraduate medical education.
    Parry KM
    Ir Med J; 1974 Sep; 68(18):477-82. PubMed ID: 4416393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Customers and contractors: recent British experience in the commissioning of research by government.
    Gummett P
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 128():35-47. PubMed ID: 6634732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Government support for R & D in the medical field.
    Farry ME
    J Med Eng Technol; 1987; 11(5):240-3. PubMed ID: 3694652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comments by the American Pharmaceutical Association to the President's Biomedical Research Panel. October 1975.
    J Pharm Sci; 1975 Nov; 64(11):III-VI. PubMed ID: 1195103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Rothschild principle.
    Br Med J; 1978 May; 1(6123):1344. PubMed ID: 647266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rothschild and medicine.
    Br Med J; 1972 Feb; 1(5796):323-4. PubMed ID: 5008652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Research strings.
    Lancet; 1971 Oct; 2(7731):963-4. PubMed ID: 4107907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Research funding: the problem with priorities.
    Nat Mater; 2003 Oct; 2(10):639. PubMed ID: 14520338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. National Institute for Health Research.
    Evans R
    Nurs Stand; 2014 Aug; 28(49):32. PubMed ID: 25095947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rebuild research now.
    Nature; 1992 Sep; 359(6393):258. PubMed ID: 1406913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. MRC cuts funding of alpha-rated projects.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1995 Aug; 376(6539):377. PubMed ID: 7630408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing research quality.
    Nat Immunol; 2006 Jul; 7(7):673. PubMed ID: 16785879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. National Science Foundation. Digging for fresh ideas in the sandpit.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5931):1128-9. PubMed ID: 19478152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. U.K. science. Review gives embattled MRC a boost.
    Bachtold D
    Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1635. PubMed ID: 12805508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.