These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5494897)

  • 1. Discrimination of auditory intensities by rats.
    Terman M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Mar; 13(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 5494897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of increments in noise intensity by monkeys.
    Clopton BM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 May; 17(3):473-81. PubMed ID: 4624513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of brief tones in noise by rats.
    Irwin RJ; Terman M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Mar; 13(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 5494896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias functions and operating characteristics of rats discriminating auditory stimuli.
    Hume AL; Irwin RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Mar; 21(2):285-95. PubMed ID: 4205654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrimination of brightness differences by rats with food or brain-stimulation reinforcement.
    Terman M; Kling JW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Jan; 11(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 5636853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antecedent reinforcement contingencies in the stimulus control of an auditory discrimination.
    Pierrel R; Blue S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov; 10(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 6080833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Latency differentiation of hits and false alarms in an operant-psychophysical test.
    Terman M; Terman JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Nov; 20(3):439-45. PubMed ID: 4759061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of yes-no and latency measures of auditory intensity discrimination.
    Green M; Terman M; Terman JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Nov; 32(3):363-72. PubMed ID: 512569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signal probability, reinforcement and signal detection.
    McCarthy D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Nov; 32(3):373-86. PubMed ID: 512570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional bias between modalities: effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination.
    Meck WH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 423():528-41. PubMed ID: 6588813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The mechanistic foundation of Weber's law.
    Pardo-Vazquez JL; Castiñeiras-de Saa JR; Valente M; Damião I; Costa T; Vicente MI; Mendonça AG; Mainen ZF; Renart A
    Nat Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1493-1502. PubMed ID: 31406366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory generalization gradients for response latency in the monkey.
    Moody DB; Stebbins WC; Iglauer C
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 5003971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation.
    Nelson DA; Schmitz JL; Donaldson GS; Viemeister NF; Javel E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2393-414. PubMed ID: 8865646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evoked Response Strength in Primary Auditory Cortex Predicts Performance in a Spectro-Spatial Discrimination Task in Rats.
    Gronskaya E; von der Behrens W
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(31):6108-6121. PubMed ID: 31175214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory intensity discrimination as a function of level-rove and tone duration in normal-hearing and impaired subjects: the "mid-level hump" revisited.
    Pienkowski M; Hagerman B
    Hear Res; 2009 Jul; 253(1-2):107-15. PubMed ID: 19345257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal discrimination and a free-operant psychophysical procedure.
    Stubbs DA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Mar; 33(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 7365406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Animal psychophysics: improvements in the tracking method.
    Harrison JM; Turnock MT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jan; 23(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 1117247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential responding as a function of auditory stimulus intensity without differential reinforcement.
    Blue S; Sherman JG; Pierrel R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 May; 15(3):371-7. PubMed ID: 5577169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Establishment of auditory discrimination and detection of tinnitus induced by salicylic acid and intense tone exposure in the rat.
    Sederholm F; Swedberg MD
    Brain Res; 2013 May; 1510():48-62. PubMed ID: 23535449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination learning with light stimuli in restrained American lobster.
    Tomina Y; Takahata M
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 229(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 22245256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.