These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5497129)
1. The diminishing time-uncertainty with the lapse of time after the warning signal in reaction-time experiments with varying fore-periods. Näätänen R Acta Psychol (Amst); 1970 Dec; 34(4):399-419. PubMed ID: 5497129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Prior time uncertainty reduction of foreperiod duration in schizophrenia and old age. Mo SS; Kersey R J Clin Psychol; 1977 Jan; 33(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 833327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On ego regression and prior time information effect in schizophrenia. Mo SS; Kersey R J Clin Psychol; 1982 Jan; 38(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 7056871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Verbal expectancy and probability in two-choice reaction time. Hinrichs JV; Craft JL J Exp Psychol; 1971 Jun; 88(3):367-71. PubMed ID: 5090927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prior time uncertainty reduction of foreperiod duration under two different levels of event uncertainty in process and reactive schizophrenia. Mo SS; Kersey R; Lowe WC J Clin Psychol; 1977 Apr; 33(2):381-4. PubMed ID: 858789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities. Rodway P Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The implicit learning of metrical and nonmetrical temporal patterns. Schultz BG; Stevens CJ; Keller PE; Tillmann B Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):360-80. PubMed ID: 22943558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distraction by irrelevant sound during foreperiods selectively impairs temporal preparation. Steinborn MB; Langner R Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):405-18. PubMed ID: 21333960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of expected delay time on the subjective value of rewards and punishments. Mischel W; Grusec J; Masters JC J Pers Soc Psychol; 1969 Apr; 11(4):363-73. PubMed ID: 5787024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Anodal tDCS over SMA decreases the probability of withholding an anticipated action. Hayduk-Costa G; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 257():208-14. PubMed ID: 24064279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrastable stimulus-response latencies: towards a model of response-stimulus synchronization. Hopkins GW Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 423():16-29. PubMed ID: 6588782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Monsell S; Mizon GA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):493-516. PubMed ID: 16822121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The scope and precision of specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm. Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):953-64. PubMed ID: 21264746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual aberration and brain hemisphere reversal of foreperiod effect on time estimation. Mo SS; Chavez MR J Clin Psychol; 1986 Sep; 42(5):787-92. PubMed ID: 3760212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The formation of a set based on illusory representations and during the perception of concrete visual stimuli]. Kostandov EA Fiziol Cheloveka; 1999; 25(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 10204289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of stimulus and task factors on Achilles tendon reflexes evoked early during a preparatory period. Scheirs JG; Brunia CH Physiol Behav; 1982 Apr; 28(4):681-5. PubMed ID: 6281829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]