172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5501851)
1. Excretory pathways for contrast media.
Cattell WR
Invest Radiol; 1970; 5(6):473-97. PubMed ID: 5501851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Excretory urography. Choice of contrast material--experimental.
McClennan BL; Becker JA; Berdon WE
Radiology; 1971 Sep; 100(3):585-90. PubMed ID: 5567318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Effect of triiodinated x-ray contrast media on the kidneys (review of the literature)].
Sergeev PV; Sviridov NK
Farmakol Toksikol; 1977; 40(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 902733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Pharmacokinetics and biotransformation of newer contrast media for uro- and angiography in the patient].
Speck U; Nagel R; Leistenschneider W; Mützel W
Rofo; 1977 Sep; 127(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 143434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Contrast medium elimination in kidney insufficiency].
Taenzer V; Herms HJ
Radiologe; 1969 Oct; 9(10):367-71. PubMed ID: 5381257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [New bilitropic contrast media].
Rosati G
Boll Chim Farm; 1972 Mar; 111(3):129-41. PubMed ID: 5041922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-protein interactions.
Lasser EC; Lang JH
Invest Radiol; 1970; 5(6):446-57. PubMed ID: 5501849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [A new contrast medium (author's transl)].
Wehling H
Radiologe; 1975 Sep; 15(9):373-6. PubMed ID: 1188093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Renal kinetics of contrast media in unilateral diseased kidney (author's transl)].
Naber K; Kuni H
Urologe A; 1982 Jan; 21(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 7200656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinico-radiological evaluation and mechanisms of renal elimination of iodamide].
Crespi Porro R; Ferrari G
Minerva Radiol; 1969 Oct; 14(10):427-35. PubMed ID: 5379534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Contrast media in angiography: present and future].
Amiel M; Eloy R
J Radiol; 1986 Mar; 67(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 3746757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Pharmacokinetics of cholecysto-cholangiographic contrast media].
Rosati G
Radiol Med; 1970 Sep; 56(9):808-20. PubMed ID: 5210608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Excretory urography. Choice of contrast material--clinical.
McClennan BL; Becker JA
Radiology; 1971 Sep; 100(3):591-5. PubMed ID: 5567319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The bolus effect in excretory urography.
Dure-Smith P; Simenhoff M; Zimskind PD; Kodroff M
Radiology; 1971 Oct; 101(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 5111977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimum dose in excretory urography. Preliminary report.
Fischer HW; Rothfield NJ; Carr JD
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1971 Nov; 113(3):423-6. PubMed ID: 5127702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The adverse effects of the water-soluble iodinated contrast media used in excretory urography in the canine species].
Hita Rosino E; Agut Giménez A; Sánchez-Valverde García MA
Actas Urol Esp; 1999 May; 23(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 10427811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Excretory urography using a double dose of triiodide contrast medium].
Perel'man VM
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1968; 43(6):63-8. PubMed ID: 5735863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sodium versus meglumine diatrizoate in excretory urography.
Knoefel PK; Kraft RP; Knight RD; Moore SK
Invest Radiol; 1974; 9(3):117-25. PubMed ID: 4836707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pharmacology of oral cholecystography].
Gaón D
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 1980; 10(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 7013405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [ANGIOGRAPHY AND UROGRAPHY. GENERALITIES ABOUT THE IODATED CONTRAST MEDIA].
BASSOLS F
Gac Med Mex; 1963 Dec; 93():1063-8. PubMed ID: 14115767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
