These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5505569)

  • 1. Peer review, utilization and fees.
    Del Med J; 1970 Sep; 42(9):248-9. PubMed ID: 5505569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What goes on?
    Woodbury JF
    N S Med Bull; 1971 Aug; 50(4):77-8. PubMed ID: 5285759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review of group therapy: Washington, D.C., 1972-1977.
    Allen MG
    Am J Psychiatry; 1979 Apr; 136(4A):444-7. PubMed ID: 426113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antitrust implications of peer review of fees.
    Jones KB
    Pa Med; 1982 Nov; 85(11):18. PubMed ID: 6891042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More about peer review.
    Overstreet SA
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1971 Apr; 69(4):283-4. PubMed ID: 5577422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medicine and the law. Peer review of fees--1985 update.
    Young MG
    Tex Med; 1985 Jun; 81(6):78-80. PubMed ID: 4012654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review of fees by physician groups: antitrust issues.
    Scott M
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(14):5-8. PubMed ID: 10277308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical review--friend or foe?
    Essrig IM
    JFMA; 1973 Mar; 60(3):34-40. PubMed ID: 4687254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review.
    Emfinger O
    J Med Assoc State Ala; 1971 Mar; 40(9):556-7. PubMed ID: 5549101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review.
    Bronson HL
    Orange Cty Dent Soc Bull; 1973 May; ():7-8. PubMed ID: 4514074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antitrust implications of chiropractic Peer Review Committees.
    Volper V
    Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 7124747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: what it means to medical specialty societies.
    Greeson TW; McClure DJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 10291133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilization and peer review. Medicine's privilege and responsibility.
    Schaffarzick RW; Parke HJ
    Calif Med; 1970 Aug; 113(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 5527892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Has doctor policing gone too far?
    Rosenberg CL
    Med Econ; 1982 Aug; 59(17):177-82, 186. PubMed ID: 10257959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informal peer review actions: can they survive the Health Care Quality Improvement Act?
    Gleitz HG; Strickland NE
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(3):25-31. PubMed ID: 10293721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A foundation approach to medical care.
    Harrington DC
    Hosp Prog; 1972 Apr; 53(4):50-2. PubMed ID: 5025724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review and high-quality medical care.
    Wilbur DL
    Postgrad Med; 1971 Oct; 50(4):229-30. PubMed ID: 5129842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fees and health care costs.
    Martz EW
    Del Med J; 1993 Jan; 65(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 8454095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health-care reform and antitrust. A primer for physicians.
    Harty-Golder B; Garland RR
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1993 May; 80(5):351-4. PubMed ID: 8315410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical associations authorized to engage in fee review programs.
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1994 May; 83(5):297-9. PubMed ID: 8027701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.