These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 550583)

  • 1. A perceived spatial frequency shift at orientations orthogonal to adapting gratings.
    Heeley DW
    Vision Res; 1979; 19(11):1229-36. PubMed ID: 550583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial frequency, orientation and color: interocular effects of adaptation on the perceived duration of gratings.
    Meyer GE; Jackson WE; Yang C
    Vision Res; 1979; 19(11):1197-201. PubMed ID: 550579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The aftereffect of a spatial offset between Gabor patches depends on carrier orientations.
    Kobayashi K; Terao M; Murakami I
    J Vis; 2012 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 22539865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motion aftereffect as a function of the contrast of sinusoidal gratings.
    Keck MJ; Palella TD; Pantle A
    Vision Res; 1976; 16(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 1266060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial-frequency-contingent color aftereffects: adaptation with one-dimensional stimuli.
    Day RH; Webster WR; Gillies O; Crassini B
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 1549425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial properties of curvature-encoding mechanisms revealed through the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects.
    Gheorghiu E; Kingdom FA
    Vision Res; 2008 Apr; 48(9):1107-24. PubMed ID: 18353425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The perceived spatial frequency, contrast, and orientation of illusory gratings.
    Georgeson MA
    Perception; 1980; 9(6):695-712. PubMed ID: 7220242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial selectivity of contrast adaptation: models and data.
    Georgeson MA; Harris MG
    Vision Res; 1984; 24(7):729-41. PubMed ID: 6464366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast threshold elevation following continuous and interrupted adaptation.
    Magnussen S; Greenlee MW
    Vision Res; 1986; 26(4):673-5. PubMed ID: 3739241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the size aftereffect direction selective?
    Nishida S; Motoyoshi I; Takeuchi T
    Vision Res; 1999 Oct; 39(21):3592-601. PubMed ID: 10746129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduction in the motion coherence threshold for the same direction as that perceived during adaptation.
    Hirahara M
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4623-33. PubMed ID: 17092532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aftereffect of adaptation to Glass patterns.
    Clifford CW; Weston E
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(11):1355-63. PubMed ID: 15743606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the spatial periodicity of moving gratings on motion response.
    Keck MJ; Montague FW; Burke TP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Nov; 19(11):1364-70. PubMed ID: 7429771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Invariant tuning of motion aftereffect.
    Wright MJ; Johnston A
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(12):1947-55. PubMed ID: 3832620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phase selectivity of spatial frequency channels.
    Jones RM; Tulunay-Keesey U
    J Opt Soc Am; 1980 Jan; 70(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 7411264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast, spatial frequency and test duration effects on the tilt aftereffect: implications for underlying mechanisms.
    Harris JP; Calvert JE
    Vision Res; 1989; 29(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 2773330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual motion detection sensitivity is enhanced by an orthogonal motion aftereffect.
    Takemura H; Murakami I
    J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):7. PubMed ID: 20884502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Form aftereffect contingent upon a colour shift.
    Dawson BM; Stromeyer CF
    Perception; 1978; 7(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 704271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating shape after-effects with radial frequency patterns.
    Anderson ND; Habak C; Wilkinson F; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 17178143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial offset of test field elements from surround elements affects the strength of motion aftereffects.
    Harris J; Sullivan D; Oakley M
    Perception; 2008; 37(7):1010-21. PubMed ID: 18773724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.