These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 550583)
21. The spatial feature underlying the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects. Gheorghiu E; Kingdom FA Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(6):834-44. PubMed ID: 17292437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A parametric account of contrast adaptation on contrast perception. Langley K Spat Vis; 2002; 16(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 12636226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Global shape aftereffects have a local substrate: A tilt aftereffect field. Dickinson JE; Almeida RA; Bell J; Badcock DR J Vis; 2010 Nov; 10(13):5. PubMed ID: 21149313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adapting to an aftereffect. Sheth BR; Shimojo S J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):29.1-10. PubMed ID: 18484835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Shifts in perceived periodicity induced by temporal modulation and their influence on the spatial frequency tuning of two aftereffects. Parker A Vision Res; 1981; 21(12):1739-47. PubMed ID: 7336610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A study of interocular transfer of spatial adaptation. Bjørklund RA; Magnussen S Perception; 1981; 10(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 7339569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Decline of the McCollough effect by orientation-specific post-adaptation exposure to achromatic gratings. Bulthé J; Beeck HP Vision Res; 2012 Feb; 55():52-6. PubMed ID: 22273999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dynamic random noise shrinks the twinkling aftereffect induced by artificial scotomas. Reich LN; Levi DM; Frishman LJ Vision Res; 2000; 40(7):805-16. PubMed ID: 10683457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Motion mechanisms with different spatiotemporal characteristics identified by an MAE technique with superimposed gratings. Shioiri S; Matsumiya K J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):30.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Individual differences in context-dependent effects reveal common mechanisms underlying the direction aftereffect and direction repulsion. McGovern DP; Walsh KS; Bell J; Newell FN Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():109-116. PubMed ID: 27756699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stimulus specificity in the human visual system. Blakemore C; Muncey JP; Ridley RM Vision Res; 1973 Oct; 13(10):1915-31. PubMed ID: 4746989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Recovery from contrast adaptation: effects of spatial and temporal frequency. Lorenceau J Vision Res; 1987; 27(12):2185-91. PubMed ID: 3447367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Size and shape after-effects: same or different mechanism? Gheorghiu E; Kingdom FA; Witney E Vision Res; 2010 Oct; 50(21):2127-36. PubMed ID: 20699103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The range of spatial frequency contingent color aftereffects. May JG; Agamy G; Matteson HH Vision Res; 1978; 18(8):917-21. PubMed ID: 706166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A shift in the perceived simultaneity of adjacent visual stimuli following adaptation to stroboscopic motion along the same axis. Bennett RG; Westheimer G Vision Res; 1985; 25(4):565-9. PubMed ID: 4060609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interocular transfer of a chromatic frequency shift. Favreau OE; Cavanagh P Vision Res; 1983; 23(10):951-7. PubMed ID: 6649440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Global shape processing: which parts form the whole? Bell J; Hancock S; Kingdom FA; Peirce JW J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):16. PubMed ID: 20884565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Texture-surround suppression of contour-shape coding in human vision. Kingdom FA; Prins N Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 18852682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]