BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5514923)

  • 1. Cochlear potential evaluation of an implantable hearing aid.
    Vernon J; Brummett B; Doyle P; Denniston R
    Surg Forum; 1970; 21():491-3. PubMed ID: 5514923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of electrical stimulation of the olivo cochlear bundle at the cochlear level.
    Buño W; García-Ausit E
    Acta Neurol Latinoam; 1970; 16(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 5538050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency dependence of cochlear microphonic augmentation produced by olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation.
    Kittrell BJ; Dalland JI
    Laryngoscope; 1969 Feb; 79(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 5765246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An amplitude-bandwidth expansion method for hearing-aid adjustment.
    Ishikawa I; Takeuti A; Murano T; Ohmine K; Kato T
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jan; 27(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 15604005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reverse transduction measured in the isolated cochlea by laser Michelson interferometry.
    Mammano F; Ashmore JF
    Nature; 1993 Oct; 365(6449):838-41. PubMed ID: 8413667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation.
    Suesserman MF; Spelman FA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar; 40(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 8335327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proceedings: 359. Effect of sciatic nerve stimulation upon cochlear microphonic potential in guinea pigs.
    Iwama M
    Nihon Seirigaku Zasshi; 1973; 35(8):533. PubMed ID: 4799751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Microphonic response of cochlea in normal and pathological conditions (review of the current literature)].
    Bakaĭ EA
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1971; 31(3):103-7. PubMed ID: 4936508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The round window electromagnetic implantable hearing aid approach.
    Spindel JH; Lambert PR; Ruth RA
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 7739865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Changes of the Nisal substance in cochlear ganglia under pure tone stimulation].
    Wüstenfeld E; Schillig R
    Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat; 1966; 71(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 5983226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long term results of electrode implantation and electronic stimulation of the cochlea in man.
    House WF; Urban J
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1973; 82(4):504-17. PubMed ID: 4721186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Niewiarowicz M; Stieler O
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005; 126(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16180345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tissue resistivities determine the current flow in the cochlea.
    Micco AG; Richter CP
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 16974151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emergence of hearing in the chicken embryo.
    Jones TA; Jones SM; Paggett KC
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jul; 96(1):128-41. PubMed ID: 16598067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effects of direct current on vibration of cochlear basilar membrane].
    Guo M
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 12761940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions and their distortion products in guinea pigs].
    Guo M; Wang J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Mar; 16(1):63-6, 70. PubMed ID: 12553279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Observations on cochlear potentials following intensive sound stimuli].
    Aran JM
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1966; 87(9):780-4. PubMed ID: 5976753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are implantable hearing devices really necessary?
    Niehaus HH; Helms J; Müller J
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1995 Apr; 74(4):271-4, 276. PubMed ID: 7758427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bandwidth determines modulatory effects of centrifugal pathways on cochlear hearing desensitization caused by loud sound.
    Rajan R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(12):3589-600. PubMed ID: 17229107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Regional specificity in the cochlea--sound reception in regional observations on electric phenomenon of the cochlea].
    Yasuno T
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 Sep; 81(3):619-23. PubMed ID: 5349052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.