These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Two years' clinical experience with puerperal insertion of intrauterine devices]. Zhou SW Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1985 Jan; 20(1):46-8, 61. PubMed ID: 3979172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of the results of intrauterine contraception. 2 year analysis of the Rostock studies by means of the life table method of Tietze and Potter]. Neumann HG Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1970 Jun; 30(6):537-47. PubMed ID: 5475936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Pregnancy following intrauterine contraception]. Kohoutek M; VĂ¡cha K Cesk Gynekol; 1967 Apr; 32(3):246-8. PubMed ID: 6083003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fertility after discontinuation of intrauterine and oral contraception. Tietze C Int J Fertil; 1968; 13(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 5700397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Six years' experience with the T Cu 220C intrauterine contraceptive device. Van Der Pas H; Thiery M; Delbeke L; Van Kets H; Haspels A Contracept Deliv Syst; 1980 Jan; 1(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12261713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Four years' experience with the Lippes Loop as a method of family planning. Williams LL; Patterson AW West Indian Med J; 1971 Mar; 20(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 5556003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Intrauterine contraception]. Bergsjo P Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1968 Jan; 88(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 5663312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Collection and evaluation of data on contraception. Swyer GI Int J Fertil; 1968; 13(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 5700394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Birnberg bow as an intrauterine contraceptive device. McCammon RE Obstet Gynecol; 1967 Jan; 29(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 6018635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical experience with Progestasert beyond one year of use. Wan LS Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Jul; 2(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 12278911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Hysterography in intrauterine contraception]. Nesit V Cesk Gynekol; 1974 Feb; 39(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 4822077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception. Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Hysterosalpingographic findings in cases of pregnancy existing despite intrauterine contraceptive devices]. Sternadel Z; Peksa A Wiad Lek; 1972 Apr; 25(8):677-82. PubMed ID: 5024971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effectiveness of intrauterine contraception in the district of Kef (Tunisia)]. Vallin J; Limaim M; Brown G; Sabagh G Tunis Med; 1968; 46(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 5674536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Profile of oral contraceptive and intrauterine device users at Benghazi. Singh R; Legnain MM Malays J Reprod Health; 1990 Jun; 8(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 12316343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A quick glance t four years of intrauterine contraception]. Clerc JP Gynaecologia; 1969; 168(6):500-2. PubMed ID: 5400758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Experience with a fluid-filled intrauterine device. Futoran JM; Kitrilakis S Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Jan; 43(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 4271814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]