184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 551835)
1. Oregon's civil commitment, statute: Stone's "thank-you theory" - a judicial survey.
Bloom JD; Shore JH; Treleaven J
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(4):381-9. PubMed ID: 551835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Thirty-five years of working with civil commitment statutes.
Bloom JD
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 15704628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Act 817 of 1979: Arkansas' new involuntary commitment law.
Faulkner LR
J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Apr; 76(11):457-63. PubMed ID: 6445353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Has the Pennsylvania legislature over-reacted in setting standards for involuntary commitment of mentally ill persons.
Rothman DA; Rothman NL
Pa Nurse; 1978 Feb; 33(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 247270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Unnecessary coercion: an end to involuntary civil commitment of retarded persons.
Dybwad G; Herr SS
Stanford Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 31(4):753-65. PubMed ID: 10242375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New develpments in civil commitment of the mentally ill. Impact for patient, family, and psychiatrist.
Williams PW
JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(21):2307-9. PubMed ID: 490828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The two-edged sword.
Smith WB
JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(21):2327. PubMed ID: 490835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Where involuntary commitment, civil liberties, and the right to mental health care collide: an overview of California's mental illness system.
Karasch M
Hastings Law J; 2003 Jan; 54(2):493-523. PubMed ID: 15287113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mentally ill and dangerous: civil commitment or internment? The Belgian judicial framework].
Smets H; Verelst R; Vandenberghe J
Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2009; 51(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 19434576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The commitment process for psychiatric patients. Changing status in the Western States.
Shore JH
West J Med; 1978 Mar; 128(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 636410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In search of a sane commitment statute.
Treffert DA; Krajeck RW
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Oregon's civil commitment law: 140 years of change.
Bloom JD; Williams MH
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1994 May; 45(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 8045542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychiatry, sociology and civil liberties.
Dunham HW
Man Med; 1977; 2(4):263-74. PubMed ID: 10316583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Davis v. Watkins on Ohio forensic hospital practice.
Heller A
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(1):39-62. PubMed ID: 508964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The ethical, medical, and legal implications of the forcible treatment provisions of the Criminal Code.
Hewak N
Health Law Can; 1995; 15(4):107-16. PubMed ID: 10143461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Components of dangerousness: legal standard in civil commitment.
Hiday VA; Markell SJ
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 7275438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rural civil commitment.
Faulkner LR; Bloom JD; Stern TO
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(4):359-71. PubMed ID: 6525461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute.
Vater JA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Oregon's Gun Relief Program for Adjudicated Mentally Ill Persons: The Psychiatric Security Review Board.
Britton J; Bloom JD
Behav Sci Law; 2015 Jun; 33(2-3):323-33. PubMed ID: 25728522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incompetence to refuse treatment: a necessary condition for civil commitment.
Lebegue B; Clark LD
Am J Psychiatry; 1981 Aug; 138(8):1075-7. PubMed ID: 7258384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
