These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5522352)

  • 1. Experimental evidence for a brain-stem contribution to visual perception in man.
    Trevarthen C
    Brain Behav Evol; 1970; 3(1):338-52. PubMed ID: 5522352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single representation of the visual midline in humans.
    Harvey LO
    Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(5):601-10. PubMed ID: 732993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemisphere function and color naming.
    Dimond S; Beaumont G
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 5083134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superiority of right visual half-fields in right-handers for recall of digits presented at varying rates.
    Hines D; Satz P
    Neuropsychologia; 1971 Mar; 9(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 5146482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateral dominance in tachistoscopic word recognition performances obtained with simultaneous bilateral input.
    McKeever WF; Hulling MD
    Neuropsychologia; 1971 Mar; 9(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 4336397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monocular contribution to binocular vision in normals and amblyopes.
    Perry NW; Childers DG
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 1972; 24(0):213-22. PubMed ID: 4671940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    White MJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bilateral tachistoscopic word recognition as a function of hemisphere stimulated and interhemispheric transfer time.
    McKeever WF; Huling MD
    Neuropsychologia; 1971 Sep; 9(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 5149299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ocular dominance affects magnitude of dipole moment: an MEG study.
    Shima H; Hasegawa M; Tachibana O; Nomura M; Yamashita J; Ozaki Y; Kawai J; Higuchi M; Kado H
    Neuroreport; 2010 Aug; 21(12):817-21. PubMed ID: 20613677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laterality differences in perception: a review.
    White MJ
    Psychol Bull; 1969 Dec; 72(6):387-405. PubMed ID: 4905908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Saccadic eye movements. Supranuclear control.
    Tusa RJ
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1989; 237():67-111. PubMed ID: 2486122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual and memory components of the superior recall of letters from the right visual half-fields.
    Hines D; Satz P; Clementino T
    Neuropsychologia; 1973 May; 11(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 4713394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual searching in normal and brain-damaged subjects (contribution to the study of unilateral inattention).
    Chédru F; Leblanc M; Lhermitte F
    Cortex; 1973 Mar; 9(1):94-111. PubMed ID: 4744359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of early monocular deprivation on visual input to cat superior colliculus.
    Hoffmann KP; Sherman SM
    J Neurophysiol; 1974 Nov; 37(6):1276-86. PubMed ID: 4436700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Right hemisphere superiority in visual orientation matching.
    Atkinson J; Egeth H
    Can J Psychol; 1973 Jun; 27(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 4711489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bilateral tachistoscopic recognitions of verbal and nonverbal stimuli.
    Hines D
    Cortex; 1972 Sep; 8(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 4637926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonverbal fixation control in young children induces a left-field advantage in digit recall.
    Kershner J; Thomae R; Callaway R
    Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(4-5):569-76. PubMed ID: 896013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric specialization in commissurotomized man.
    Nebes RD
    Psychol Bull; 1974 Jan; 81(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 4590870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dichoptic visual motion stimulation and the frequency of optokinetic nystagmus.
    Zikmund V; Jagla F
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1978 Feb; 20(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 636761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION AND CEREBRAL DOMINANCE.
    BRYDEN MP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Dec; 19():686. PubMed ID: 14238194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.