These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5526995)

  • 1. Nonsurgical recording of human auditory nerve action potentials and cochlear microphonics.
    Coats AC; Dickey JR
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1970 Aug; 79(4):844-52. PubMed ID: 5526995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of auditory single fiber responses during acoustic and electric stimulation of the intact cat cochlea.
    Hartmann R; Topp G; Klinke R
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1982; 234(2):187-8. PubMed ID: 7092705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Genetic nature of the dissociation between the cochlear microphonic potential and the action potential of the auditory nerve of the audiogenic mouse].
    Niaussat MM
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1968 Jul; 162(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 4236014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Changes of the action potentials of the 8th nerve and cochlear potentials caused by thermal stimulation].
    Nishida S
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1974 Nov; 77(11):931-43. PubMed ID: 4477184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On cochlear sharpening and cross-correlation methods.
    de Boer E; Jongkees LB
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1968; 65(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 5657123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Changes of the intensity function of the response of the auditory nerve (N 1) by masking sounds].
    Legouix JP; Remond MC; Delvoye M
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1970; 164(5):988-91. PubMed ID: 4250675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term partial eighth nerve section in cats. Effect on auditory discrimination.
    Mikaelian DO; Warfield D
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1970 Apr; 91(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 5438736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can we use the cochlear microphonic in electrocochleography.
    Beagley HA
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1974; 95(7-8):531-6. PubMed ID: 4460146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory responses in cats produced by pulsed ultrasound.
    Foster KR; Wiederhold ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Apr; 63(4):1199-205. PubMed ID: 649878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cerebellar actions on cochlear microphonics and on auditory nerve action potential.
    Velluti R; Crispino L
    Brain Res Bull; 1979; 4(5):621-4. PubMed ID: 487218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective study of the auditory process with particular reference to "cochleo-cochlear" cross-over function.
    Hilger JA; Boies LR; Hohmann A; Roth NA
    Laryngoscope; 1966 Aug; 76(8):1353-64. PubMed ID: 5925175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Electric function potentials of the auditory analyzer].
    Sekula J; Trabka J
    Acta Physiol Pol; 1967; 18(5):747-54. PubMed ID: 6062744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Bioelectric activity of the cochlear apparatus and auditory nerve in the normal cat].
    Bakai EA
    Fiziol Zh; 1973; 19(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 4690935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kiang NY; Moxon EC; Levine RA
    Ciba Found Symp; 1970; ():241-73. PubMed ID: 5210916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human auditory nerve action potentials.
    Coats AC
    Neurology; 1970 Apr; 20(4):418. PubMed ID: 5535083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effects of lowering perilymph calcium concentration on various cochlear potentials].
    Wang J; Dong WJ; Chen JS; Liu JL
    Sheng Li Xue Bao; 1994 Aug; 46(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 7973823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [System of recording of the cochlear microphonic response and action potential of the acoustic nerve].
    Popov IuV; Bakaĭ EA; Kaduk BG
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1978; (2):108-9. PubMed ID: 654541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation of the auditory frequency-following responses as compared to cochlear potentials.
    Hou SM; Lipscomb DM
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1979; 222(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 444158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Electrophysiologic studies on the peripheral part of the human ear, using appropriate computer programs].
    Spreng M; Bumm P; Keidel WD; Wiegand HP
    Pflugers Arch; 1969; 307(2):R134. PubMed ID: 5814790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arousal effects on cochlear potentials: investigation of a two-factor hypothesis.
    Irvine DR; Webster WR
    Brain Res; 1972 Apr; 39(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 4337198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.