These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 55345)

  • 1. The human frequency-following response: its behavior during continuous tone and tone burst stimulation.
    Glaser EM; Suter CM; Dasheiff R; Goldberg A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1976 Jan; 40(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 55345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: correlates of low pitch auditory perception in humans.
    Marsh JT; Brown WS; Smith JC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Feb; 38(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 45941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The audiometric utility of brain stem responses to low-frequency sounds.
    Davis H; Hirsh SK
    Audiology; 1976; 15(3):181-95. PubMed ID: 938332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory brainstem responses in the aged cat.
    Harrison J; Buchwald J
    Neurobiol Aging; 1982; 3(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 6298646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brainstem auditory evoked responses elicited by tone-burst stimuli in clinically normal dogs.
    Uzuka Y; Fukaki M; Hara Y; Matsumoto H
    J Vet Intern Med; 1998; 12(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 9503356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity.
    Burkard R; Hecox K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1214-23. PubMed ID: 6643844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of tones and their modification by noise in nonhuman primates.
    Dylla M; Hrnicek A; Rice C; Ramachandran R
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 14(4):547-60. PubMed ID: 23515749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evoked potential tone-on-tone masking patterns in the chinchilla.
    Robertson LF; Salvi RJ; Poon M; Powers NL
    Am J Otol; 1990 Nov; 11(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 2285064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evoked-response tone-on-tone masking in the chinchilla: effect of masker frequency.
    Subramaniam M; Salvi RJ; Saunders SS; Boettcher FA
    Audiology; 1990; 29(4):202-11. PubMed ID: 2222289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of gabapentin on gap detection and forward masking in young and old gerbils.
    Gleich O; Strutz J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 21730860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Normative behavioral thresholds for short tone-bursts.
    Beattie RC; Rochverger I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Oct; 12(9):453-61. PubMed ID: 11699816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnosis of auditory threshold with frequency-specific recording of auditory evoked potentials: personal results and methodological aspects].
    Schönweiler R; Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):531-8. PubMed ID: 7495433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects.
    Gorga MP; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KA; Jesteadt W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Mar; 31(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 3352259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential. Effects of signal intensity and masking noise.
    Schwent VL; Hillyard SA; Galambos R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1976 Jun; 40(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 57047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Interplay Between Spike-Time and Spike-Rate Modes in the Auditory Nerve Encodes Tone-In-Noise Threshold.
    Huet A; Desmadryl G; Justal T; Nouvian R; Puel JL; Bourien J
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 38(25):5727-5738. PubMed ID: 29793977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of direct sequential masking on evoked potentials in the auditory area of the cortex in guinea pigs.
    Petropavlovskaya EA
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2005 Jan; 35(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 15739788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.