BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5538050)

  • 1. Effect of electrical stimulation of the olivo cochlear bundle at the cochlear level.
    Buño W; García-Ausit E
    Acta Neurol Latinoam; 1970; 16(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 5538050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency dependence of cochlear microphonic augmentation produced by olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation.
    Kittrell BJ; Dalland JI
    Laryngoscope; 1969 Feb; 79(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 5765246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulation of efferents alters the cochlear microphonic and the sound-induced resistance changes measured in scale media of the guinea pig.
    Mountain DC; Geisler CD; Hubbard AE
    Hear Res; 1980 Oct; 3(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 7440426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Influence of the olivo-cochlear bundle (OCB) on/cochlear microphonic (CM) potentials and on action potentials (AP). II. Stimulation of the OCB].
    Precerutti G; Vescovi V
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1975 Aug; 51(15-16):941-6. PubMed ID: 1218115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cochlear potentials in the prenatal period in guinea pigs].
    Romand R; Granier MR; Pujol R
    J Physiol (Paris); 1971; 63(6):280A-281A. PubMed ID: 5152297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diverse responses of single auditory afferent fibres to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus in guinea-pig.
    Mulders WH; Robertson D
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 15309356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Function of the olivocochlear system.
    Pfalz KJ
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1973; 20():311-5. PubMed ID: 4710514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some factors modulating neural activities in peripheral auditory centers.
    Marsh JT; Worden FG
    Brain Res; 1969 Jan; 12(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 4308405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of centrifugal pathways on responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in noise.
    Mulders WH; Seluakumaran K; Robertson D
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 27(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 18279322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suppressing effect of substance P receptor antagonist on sound evoked potentials recorded from the guinea pig cochlea.
    Liang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Ni D
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1999 Feb; 112(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 11593577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between human and animal cochlear potentials.
    Kupperman R
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971 Nov; 92():Suppl:739-51. PubMed ID: 5148988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noradrenergic modulation of brainstem nuclei alters cochlear neural output.
    Mulders WH; Robertson D
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):147-55. PubMed ID: 15925200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Tonotopography of the audiotory pathway: Anatomical and physiological findings (author's transl)].
    Pirsig W
    HNO; 1974 Oct; 22(10):309-16. PubMed ID: 4448710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial results from a model of ephaptic excitation in the electrically excited peripheral auditory nervous system.
    Jönsson R; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):49-56. PubMed ID: 18255244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of electrical current applied to cochlear partition on discharges in individual auditory-nerve fibers. II. Interaction of electrical polarization and acoustic stimulation.
    Teas DC; Konishi T; Wernick JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Jun; 47(6):1527-37. PubMed ID: 5426305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of hemicholinium on a centrifugal auditory pathway.
    Comis SD; Davies WE
    J Physiol; 1969 Feb; 200(2):112P-113P. PubMed ID: 5764384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear adaptation in guinea pigs. A quantitative description.
    Eggermont JJ; Spoor A
    Audiology; 1973; 12(4):193-220. PubMed ID: 4722021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unit responses in the rat cochlear nucleus to repetitive, transient sounds.
    Moller AR
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1969 Apr; 75(4):542-51. PubMed ID: 5358874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The maturation of the cochlear potentials during the perinatal period in the cat and the guinea pig].
    Romand R
    J Physiol (Paris); 1971; 63(8):763-82. PubMed ID: 5151327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of electrical current applied to cochlear partition on discharges in individual auditory-nerve fibers. I. Prolonged direct-current polarization.
    Konishi T; Teas DC; Wernick JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Jun; 47(6):1519-26. PubMed ID: 5426304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.