193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5538302)
1. Counseling and referral for legal abortion in California's Bay area.
Goldsmith S; Potts L; Green L; Miller R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Jun; 2(3):14-9. PubMed ID: 5538302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Teenagers, sex and contraception.
Goldsmith S; Gabrielson MO; Gabrielson I; Mathews V; Potts L
Fam Plann Perspect; 1972 Jan; 4(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 5020856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pregnancy counseling and abortion referral for patients in Federally funded family planning programs.
Rosoff JI
Fam Plann Perspect; 1976; 8(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 1253951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and the unwanted child.
Guttmacher AF; Pilpel HF
Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Mar; 2(2):16-24. PubMed ID: 5520624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment.
Shapiro AA
Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pregnancy detection: a critical service link.
Oettinger KB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Oct; 3(4):15-8. PubMed ID: 5140231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech.
Weeks AB
North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Tasks of the public health service in further development of marriage and family counseling centers in Berlin].
Klessen D; Schorr R
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1971 Jul; 65(13):672-9. PubMed ID: 5164943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Free pregnancy testing service in New York City.
Fiedler DE; Aldrich MM; Armstrong V; Arkanoff M
Public Health Rep; 1975; 90(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 803698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Showing them the way. Feds settle Mo. abortion-referral controversy that jeopardized clinic funding.
Galloro V
Mod Healthc; 2001 Aug; 31(33):22-3. PubMed ID: 11521479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Should family planning clinics perform abortions?
Fairchild E; Penfield AJ
Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Apr; 3(2):15-7. PubMed ID: 5098781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral.
Hirt TC
Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Consultation offices for family planning in Switzerland].
Albrecht E; Beerli M; Brunner M; Deschwanden D; Flacher R; Jenal U
Bibl Gynaecol; 1970; 55():44-56. PubMed ID: 5526744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimates of pregnancies averted through California's family planning waiver program in 2002.
Foster DG; Biggs MA; Amaral G; Brindis C; Navarro S; Bradsberry M; Stewart F
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2006 Sep; 38(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 16963385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Family planning: visit without parents].
Prudhomme M
Arch Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 13(6):745-8. PubMed ID: 16698253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Statutory prohibition on use of appropriated funds in programs where abortion is a method of family planning; standard of compliance for family planning services projects--PHS. Final rules.
Fed Regist; 1988 Feb; 53(21):2922-46. PubMed ID: 10285637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. East Asia Review, 1973. 7. Singapore.
Kee WF
Stud Fam Plann; 1974 May; 5(5):163-5. PubMed ID: 4828071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. East Asia Review, 1973. 3. Korea (South).
Chang KS
Stud Fam Plann; 1974 May; 5(5):152-6. PubMed ID: 4828067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Free standing abortion clinics: a new phenomenon.
Hausknecht RU
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1973 Nov; 49(11):985-91. PubMed ID: 4517917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
