These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. High frequency Bekesy audiometry: II. Threshold test procedure, reliability and validity. Gauz MT; Ahroon WA; Roberts SD J Aud Res; 1981 Jan; 21(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 7349867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-frequency Bekesy audiometry: VI. Pulsed vs. continuous signals. Gauz MT; Smith MM J Aud Res; 1987 Jan; 27(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 3448068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry. Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P Audiology; 1979; 18(5):414-29. PubMed ID: 496724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds. Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of warble-tone frequency deviation on threshold measurement in cases with sloping audiometric configurations. Lundeen C J Aud Res; 1987 Jan; 27(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 3448067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing. Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The manual LOT test. Lankford JE; Meissner WA J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(6):219-22. PubMed ID: 893192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suprathreshold Bekesy excursion widths in normal and sensorineural impaired listeners. Domico WD J Aud Res; 1985 Apr; 25(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 3842136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects. Tomlin D; Rance G; Graydon K; Tsialios I Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):580-8. PubMed ID: 17062499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss. van der Drift JF; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA Audiology; 1987; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3593096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of manual and computer-controlled audiometry using identical procedures. Jerlvall L; Dryselius H; Arlinger S Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 6689085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-frequency Bekesy audiometry: IV. Normative aspects for normal-hearing young adult. Guaz MT; Allen DV J Aud Res; 1983 Jan; 23(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 6677637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Bekesy descending-only procedure: effects of attenuation rate and step size, and starting level. Young IM; Lowry LD; Menduke H J Aud Res; 1985 Oct; 25(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 3843096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Air-bone gap distributions in normal-hearing subjects. Frank T; Klobuka CS; Sotir PJ J Aud Res; 1983 Oct; 23(4):261-9. PubMed ID: 6681327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Agreement between auditory threshold calculated from cortical evoked response audiometry and tone audiometry in occupational hearing loss]. Janisch R; Jerábek J Cesk Otolaryngol; 1990 Aug; 39(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 2289246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]