These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5539569)

  • 1. Factors related to progression of cervical atypias.
    Hulka BS; Redmond CK
    Am J Epidemiol; 1971 Jan; 93(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 5539569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Morphology and development of 106 cervical atypias observed during 12,300 pregnancies].
    de Brux J; Panopoulos C; Coupez F
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1971; 66(11):671-9. PubMed ID: 5148541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A comparison between mass screening for uterine neck cancer in the Districts of Frederiksberg and Maribo].
    Koch F; Klinken L; Albrechtsen R
    Nord Med; 1971 Dec; 86(50):1534. PubMed ID: 5135061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studs on population screening for early carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Bjerre B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1969; 6():1-140. PubMed ID: 5266058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Papanicolaou smear: an insensitive case-finding procedure.
    Shulman JJ; Leyton M; Hamilton R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Oct; 120(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 4416606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Arkansas cervical cancer program.
    Steinkamp RC; Roman-Lopez J; Kenney JA; Hairston MG; Hylton S; Hammett WN; Marsh S; Becton P; Collier S
    J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Jan; 76(1):312-22. PubMed ID: 6444400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motivation techniques in a cancer detection program.
    Hulka BS
    Public Health Rep (1896); 1966 Nov; 81(11):1009-14. PubMed ID: 4958781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A correlated cyto-histopathologic approach to the rapid diagnosis of cervical atypias.
    Kaufman RH; Johnson WA; Spjut HJ; Smith A
    Acta Cytol; 1967; 11(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 5233439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Detection of carcinoma of the uterine cervix in a large hospital. Organizational criteria. Preliminary results and experiences].
    Morgera P
    Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Feb; 23(3):124-32. PubMed ID: 5089724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why pelvic examinations in cervical cancer screening?
    Hulka BS; Pace IS
    Am J Public Health Nations Health; 1968 Oct; 58(10):1854-63. PubMed ID: 5693011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cytodiagnosis in gynecological patients].
    Perez A; Oddo H; Duarte I; Escudero P; Rosati S; Capurro I
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1974; 39(6):244-54. PubMed ID: 4469931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical cytology: its value and limitations.
    Jeffcoate TN
    Br Med J; 1966 Nov; 2(5522):1091-4. PubMed ID: 5920670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smears from the cervix. Cancer cell detection.
    Wells AH; Kundel DW; Helwig KL; Michaelis DL; Goldschmidt VG
    Minn Med; 1968 Jan; 51(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 5636225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical cancer, Pap smear and HPV testing: an update of the role of organized Pap smear screening and HPV testing.
    Sigurdsson K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Jul; 78(6):467-77. PubMed ID: 10376855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
    Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevalence and determinants of cervical cytology use in an urban sample of Portuguese women.
    Alves C; Alves L; Lunet N
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2009 Nov; 18(6):482-8. PubMed ID: 19734793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of mass cytological screening programme in the early detection of cervical cancer.
    Devi NN; Vijayalakshmi A; Nair MB; Devi KR
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1974 Aug; 63(3):92-5. PubMed ID: 4443577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for cervical cancer in occupational health programs.
    Hulka BS
    Arch Environ Health; 1970 Mar; 20(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 5415830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved prognosis of cervical cancer due to comprehensive screening.
    Macgregor JE; Fraser ME; Mann EM
    Lancet; 1971 Jan; 1(7689):74-6. PubMed ID: 4099228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cytology in Greenland and occurrence of cervical carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, and dysplasia. Extent and impact of uncoordinated screening activity 1976-1985.
    Højgaard Nielsen N; Jensen H; Hansen PK
    Arctic Med Res; 1988 Oct; 47(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 3214508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.