These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5548948)

  • 21. Noise monitoring and establishment of a comprehensive hearing conservation program.
    Randolph MM; Hill WA; Randolph BW
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2007 Jan; 46(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 17203915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparative studies of the damming effect and the wearing properties of hearing protective devices at the place of work].
    Schulz G; Rublack K; Meister A; Dybowski S; Dubrau KH; Gretzschel D
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1983 Feb; 29(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 6858266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Balancing speech intelligibility versus sound exposure in selection of personal hearing protection equipment for Chinook aircrews.
    Van Wijngaarden SJ; Rots G
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1037-44. PubMed ID: 11718509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Noise and the conservation of hearing.
    Robinson M
    R I Med J; 1970 Mar; 53(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 5264910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Scheduling hearing testing in industry.
    Anderson EL; Sataloff J; Vassallo L; Menduke H
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1974 Apr; 35(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 4822356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of hearing protection on narrowband signal detection in industrial noise.
    Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1983 Apr; 12(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 6864854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
    Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ear muffs: a field guide.
    Sokol B
    Occup Health Saf; 2005 Jun; 74(6):66, 68, 138. PubMed ID: 16047972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.
    Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Functional state of adolescent workers exposed to occupational noise and using FPP-Sh (Berushi)-type antinoise inserts].
    Gel'tishcheva EA
    Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1981 Mar; (3):16-8. PubMed ID: 7215906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comprehensive noise survey of the S-70A-9 Black Hawk helicopter.
    King RB; Saliba AJ; Brock JR
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1999 Feb; 70(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 10206928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of earplugs on passenger speech reception in rotary-wing aircraft.
    Williams CE; Forstall JR; Parsons WC
    Aerosp Med; 1971 Jul; 42(7):750-2. PubMed ID: 5162440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Decrease of autonomic reactions to noise through use of ear protectors].
    Jansen G
    Med Klin; 1971 Jun; 66(30):1068. PubMed ID: 5569265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.
    Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 16197280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing conservation: industrial aspects in California.
    GLORIG A
    Calif Med; 1957 Sep; 87(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 13460720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The efficiency of hearing protection to impulse noise.
    Forrest MR
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):186-93. PubMed ID: 6939087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of comfort of various hearing protection devices (HPD).
    Bhattacharya SK; Tripathi SR; Kashyap SK
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1993 Dec; 22(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 7963482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Considerations on the problem of noise in relation to its influence on some aspects of modern life. I. Behavior of the temporary shift of hearing sensitivity due to high energy level stimulations in persons employed in work with noise].
    Collatina S; Curi L; Bianchi F
    Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1965; 17(4):357-70. PubMed ID: 5886003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Noise-induced hearing loss.
    Harv Mens Health Watch; 2007 Dec; 12(5):3-5. PubMed ID: 18225333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.