These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5549101)

  • 1. Peer review.
    Emfinger O
    J Med Assoc State Ala; 1971 Mar; 40(9):556-7. PubMed ID: 5549101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical associations authorized to engage in fee review programs.
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1994 May; 83(5):297-9. PubMed ID: 8027701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. OMA questions operations, methods of provincial medical review committee.
    Korcok M
    Can Med Assoc J; 1974 Aug; 111(4):349-51. PubMed ID: 4853518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What goes on?
    Woodbury JF
    N S Med Bull; 1971 Aug; 50(4):77-8. PubMed ID: 5285759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review of group therapy: Washington, D.C., 1972-1977.
    Allen MG
    Am J Psychiatry; 1979 Apr; 136(4A):444-7. PubMed ID: 426113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Has doctor policing gone too far?
    Rosenberg CL
    Med Econ; 1982 Aug; 59(17):177-82, 186. PubMed ID: 10257959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A foundation approach to medical care.
    Harrington DC
    Hosp Prog; 1972 Apr; 53(4):50-2. PubMed ID: 5025724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicine and the law. Peer review of fees--1985 update.
    Young MG
    Tex Med; 1985 Jun; 81(6):78-80. PubMed ID: 4012654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review, utilization and fees.
    Del Med J; 1970 Sep; 42(9):248-9. PubMed ID: 5505569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antitrust implications of peer review of fees.
    Jones KB
    Pa Med; 1982 Nov; 85(11):18. PubMed ID: 6891042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review of fees by physician groups: antitrust issues.
    Scott M
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(14):5-8. PubMed ID: 10277308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. More about peer review.
    Overstreet SA
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1971 Apr; 69(4):283-4. PubMed ID: 5577422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical societies, peer review, and CSMS-IPA.
    Brunell RJ
    Conn Med; 1987 May; 51(5):325. PubMed ID: 3595134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MMA peer review program to monitor quality of care.
    Hanson PC
    Minn Med; 1993 Apr; 76(4):31-3. PubMed ID: 8515734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Code of ethics of the Canadian Medical Association.
    Canadian Medical Association
    J Int Bioethique; 1997; 8(1-2):123-5. PubMed ID: 11655377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. West Virginia State Medical Association's voluntary peer review service.
    Hamaty D
    W V Med J; 1970 Sep; 66(9):307-9. PubMed ID: 5293536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: what it means to medical specialty societies.
    Greeson TW; McClure DJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 10291133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review in Kentucky.
    Bowers MA
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1972 Oct; 70(10):794-5. PubMed ID: 5073349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In the matter of Chester A. DiLallo MD before the Commission on Medical Discipline of Maryland.
    Md State Med J; 1983 Oct; 32(10):779-80. PubMed ID: 6645639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review: impact of a system based on billing claims.
    Buck CR; White KL
    N Engl J Med; 1974 Oct; 291(17):877-83. PubMed ID: 4606894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.