These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Awareness and attitudes about disease mongering among medical and pharmaceutical students. Kumar CJ; Deoker A; Kumar A; Kumar A; Hegde BM PLoS Med; 2006 Apr; 3(4):e213. PubMed ID: 16597182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Code of fair practices in the promotion of drug products. Md State Med J; 1967 Dec; 16(12):139-40. PubMed ID: 6079133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. ["Time for more selective information"]. Löjdquist J Lakartidningen; 1972 Mar; 69():35-8. PubMed ID: 4664122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pharmacists' and physicians' attitudes toward pharmaceutical marketing practices. Poirier TI; Giannetti V; Giudici RA Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Feb; 51(3):378-81. PubMed ID: 8160692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A national survey on the effect of pharmaceutical promotion on medical students. Vainiomäki M; Helve O; Vuorenkoski L Med Teach; 2004 Nov; 26(7):630-4. PubMed ID: 15763854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical evaluation of the claims made by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotional material in Pakistan. Rohra DK; Gilani AH; Memon IK; Perven G; Khan MT; Zafar H; Kumar R J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2006; 9(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 16849008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Is the pharmaceutical industry really as bad as its reputation?]. Prat EH Wien Med Wochenschr; 2005 Nov; 155(21-22):502-12. PubMed ID: 16425111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A survey of physicians' reactions to drug promotion. Fassold RW; Gowdey CW Can Med Assoc J; 1968 Apr; 98(14):701-5. PubMed ID: 5646111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Promoting research and graduate education by the pharmaceutical industry--scientific progress or marketing strategy?]. Eckardt VF Z Gastroenterol; 1999 Jul; Suppl 2():19-27. PubMed ID: 10472695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Resisting drug propaganda]. Kalsbeek F Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1973 Jan; 117(4):141-5. PubMed ID: 4683811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Distinctions with little difference: pseudo-competition in the pharmaceutical industry. Drug Ther Bull; 1976 Jul; 14(14):53-4. PubMed ID: 964128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pharmaceutical promotion and its impact on the practice of medicine. HAINES TF J Med Assoc State Ala; 1963 Apr; 32():310-4. PubMed ID: 13951989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Drug advertising. Med J Aust; 1987 Jun; 146(12):660-1. PubMed ID: 3626920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peddling drugs to docs. Heussner RC Minn Med; 1994 Jun; 77(6):24-31. PubMed ID: 8041331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [On ethical issues of pharmaceutical communication. National Association of Hungarian Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Wholesalers]. Kata M; Sánta Z Orv Hetil; 1994 Oct; 135(42):2343-7. PubMed ID: 7970650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct mail promotion. BOYER F Bull N Y Acad Med; 1962 Mar; 38(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 13872180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical students' attitudes toward pharmaceutical marketing: possibilities for change. Vinson DC; McCandless B; Hosokawa MC Fam Med; 1993 Jan; 25(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 8454121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]