These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5550619)

  • 1. The relative contribution of visual and auditory components of speech to speech intelligibility as a function of three conditions of frequency distortion.
    Sanders DA; Goodrich SJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Mar; 14(1):154-9. PubMed ID: 5550619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory-visual perception of speech with reduced optical clarity.
    Erber NP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):212-23. PubMed ID: 491551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual constancy in complex sound identification.
    Webster JC; Woodhead MM; Carpenter A
    Br J Psychol; 1970 Nov; 61(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 5487459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bimodal audio-visual training enhances auditory adaptation process.
    Kawase T; Sakamoto S; Hori Y; Maki A; Suzuki Y; Kobayashi T
    Neuroreport; 2009 Sep; 20(14):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19629016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual speech improves the intelligibility of time-expanded auditory speech.
    Tanaka A; Sakamoto S; Tsumura K; Suzuki Y
    Neuroreport; 2009 Mar; 20(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19240661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between speech sound discrimination skills and language abilities of kindergarten children.
    Perozzi JA; Kunze LH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 5558094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selectivity for distortions and words in speech perception.
    Haggard M
    Br J Psychol; 1974 Feb; 65(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 4822773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of acoustic cues in fricatives on perceptual confusions in preschool children.
    Abbs MS; Minifie FD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1969 Dec; 46(6):1535-42. PubMed ID: 5361526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of degradation of intensity, time, or frequency content on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):529-42. PubMed ID: 11508977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of roving level and spectral range on vowel formant discrimination.
    Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL264-70. PubMed ID: 21974502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of visual rearrangement and visual motion on sound localization.
    Lackner JR
    Neuropsychologia; 1974 Mar; 12(2):291-3. PubMed ID: 4842388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of audio-visual information on the intelligibility of alaryngeal speech.
    Evitts PM; Portugal L; Van Dine A; Holler A
    J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 20005524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developmental aphasia: rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception.
    Tallal P; Piercy M
    Neuropsychologia; 1974 Jan; 12(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 4821193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligibility of distorted speech sounds shifted in frequency and time in normal children.
    Nagafuchi M
    Audiology; 1976; 15(4):326-37. PubMed ID: 1275817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes of auditory word discrimination induced by inversion of the visual field.
    Cegalis JA; Murdza S
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1976 Jun; 85(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 932318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech.
    Yi HG; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL387-93. PubMed ID: 24181980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of simulated cataracts on speech intelligibility.
    Morris NL; Chaparro A; Downs D; Wood JM
    Vision Res; 2012 Aug; 66():49-54. PubMed ID: 22750022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility.
    Dirks DD; Wilson RH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Mar; 12(1):5-38. PubMed ID: 5779912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.