BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5553174)

  • 1. [Epidemiological aspects of detection of carcinoma of the cervix in the region of Ljubljana].
    Kovacic J; Bonta S
    Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Jan; 23(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 5553174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Significance of physical findings in diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
    Moller KA; Fogh H; Moller PE; Strandbygard K
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 5041568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [1-year results in the detection of precanceroses and carcinoma of the uterine cervix in Baranja].
    Milojković M; Pajtler M; Makarović Z; Lederer B; Jarcov R
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1986; 26(5-6):119-22. PubMed ID: 3657276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A critical evaluation of the vaginal irrigation kit as a screening method for the detection of cancer of the cervix.
    Anderson WA; Gunn SA
    Acta Cytol; 1966; 10(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 5227363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cytological screening for precancerous lesions of the cervix.
    Sng I
    Singapore Med J; 1987 Oct; 28(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 3433107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Results of the Leiden mass screening for cervix uteri carcinoma; the 'young' (24-34 years) versus the 'old' (35-54 years) group of women].
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud-Gentenaar JC; Beck S
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Aug; 134(32):1545-9. PubMed ID: 2392176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results from a cervical cancer screening programme in Manitoba, Canada.
    Choi NW; Nelson NA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):61-7. PubMed ID: 3570416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Significance of systematic examinations of working women in the detection of uterine cervix cancer].
    Mekuli S; Krajinović S; Udicki S; Bosković M; Nastasović M; Ducić S; Maric R; Obradović M; Sokić S; Radovanović Z
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1969 Jun; 97(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 5198723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some results in the detection of cervical carcinoma.
    Mekuli S; Stambolovic B; Krajinovic S; Udicki S; Ducic S; Boskovic M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Jan; 23(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 5553175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prophylaxis and early detection of cervix carcinoma].
    Held E
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1970 Jul; 59(28):1021-9. PubMed ID: 5512823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cytological diagnosis of cancer of the uterine cervix. Results during 1971].
    Gerber E; Vajda D
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1972 Oct; 92(10):813-28. PubMed ID: 4660894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A mass survey of the incidence of cervix cancer].
    Thorarinsson A; Jensson O; Bjarnason O
    Nord Med; 1967 Dec; 78(49):1608-11. PubMed ID: 6073716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Vaginal cytological cancer screening in Samsø. A preliminary report].
    Hornbak H; Biorn-Henriksen T; Olsen JC
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1968 Feb; 130(6):226. PubMed ID: 5676289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cytological mass screening in Ostfold County, Norway.
    Magnus K; Langmark F
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):87-90. PubMed ID: 3570418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The early detection of unsuspected carcinoma of cervix in Malaysia by exfoliative cytological screening.
    Sinnathuray TA; Lau KS
    Med J Malaysia; 1973 Dec; 28(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 4276263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Registration of carcinoma in situ and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the screening area of Nijmegen from 1 January 1970 through 31 July 1982].
    Klinkhamer PJ; van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1984 Oct; 128(42):1979-83. PubMed ID: 6504185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Results of the epidemiologic survey for the detection of cervical cancer in women of Lakavec and surroundings].
    Petrović M; Krajinović S; Udicki S; Petrović L; Radovanović Z; Vlajinac H; Ducić S
    Nar Zdrav; 1971 Sep; 27(9):332-5. PubMed ID: 5155792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Walton report and its subsequent impact on cervical cancer screening programs in Canada.
    Worth AJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 6694805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Studs on population screening for early carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Bjerre B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1969; 6():1-140. PubMed ID: 5266058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Incidence of cervical cancer 5 years after mass screening in the community of Medvesćak].
    Juras N; Tućan V; Pirkić A; Sućur A
    Acta Med Iugosl; 1984; 38(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 6496168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.