These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5554274)
61. A survey of digital chest radiography. Johnson GA; Ravin CE Radiol Clin North Am; 1983 Dec; 21(4):655-64. PubMed ID: 6361846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The metamorphosis of the medical technologist. Soni VP Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Mar; 58(3):22-3. PubMed ID: 6112184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Assessment of the quality of the neonatal chest x-ray film. Grossglauser L Neonatal Netw; 2000 Mar; 19(2):40-3. PubMed ID: 11948997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. The benefits of using CQI/TQM data. Dowd SB; Tilson E Radiol Technol; 1996; 67(6):533-7. PubMed ID: 8827822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. [Morbidity of personnel in roentgen-diagnostic laboratories]. Usol'tsev VI Gig Sanit; 1982 Jun; (6):86-7. PubMed ID: 6213458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. [The influence of funnel chest on the sagittal chest x-ray]. Jaeschke G Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1970; 11(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 5515183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Recruitment and retention topics for a changing environment in medical imaging. Luckett DR Radiol Manage; 2000; 22(5):32-7. PubMed ID: 11151319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. [Activities in the roentgen department]. Monvall E Vardfacket; 1977 Jan; 1(2):14-7. PubMed ID: 584630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. [Distance technic to reduce the scatter radiation component in x-ray images. With special reference to high-kilovoltage chest radiography]. Gajewski H; Müller D Strahlentherapie; 1969 Dec; 138(6):689-95. PubMed ID: 5381725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Interpretation of chest roentgenograms by primary care physicians. Kuritzky L; Haddy RI; Curry RW South Med J; 1987 Nov; 80(11):1347-51. PubMed ID: 3686134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. [Dynamics of the irradiation dosages of Leningrad x-ray diagnostic office personnel during the period of 1963-1977 and its causes]. Usol'tsev VI Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1979; (6):69-72. PubMed ID: 160652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. [A comparison of the picture quality of the general x-ray picture and of the radiophotograph of the chest]. Tautz M; Ertl S Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1970; 11(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 5511031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Effect of changes in imaging technology on dose received by technologists. Hale J; Laufer I; Ditz BL Radiology; 1989 Nov; 173(2):576. PubMed ID: 2798898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. X-ray image processing and its evaluation. Ziskin MC; Shea FJ; Kundel HL; Revesz G J Assoc Adv Med Instrum; 1972; 6(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 5052962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. A distance-assisted training program for nuclear medicine technologists. Patterson HE; Hutton BF; Nair PG; Padhy AK J Nucl Med Technol; 1999 Dec; 27(4):318-20. PubMed ID: 10646555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Focal film distance in chest radiography. Hendry JE Radiol Technol; 1997; 69(2):126. PubMed ID: 9397472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Nuclear medicine technologists in the U.S.: findings from a 2005 survey. Center for Health Workforce Studies of the University of Albany J Nucl Med Technol; 2006 Dec; 34(4):244-9. PubMed ID: 17146115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]