These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5558600)

  • 1. Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Ostfold County, Norway.
    Pedersen E; Hoeg K; Kolstad P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1971; 50(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 5558600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Ostfold County, Norway: an experiment. Second report of the Norwegian Cancer Society.
    Pedersen E; Hoeg K; Kolstad P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1971; ():Suppl 11:1-18. PubMed ID: 5285978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cytological mass screening in Ostfold County, Norway.
    Magnus K; Langmark F
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):87-90. PubMed ID: 3570418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mass screening of cervical cancer in Ostfold 1959-77. An analysis based on the follow -up study completed December 31, 1982].
    Magnus K; Langmark F; Andersen A; Skjerven JE
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1986 May; 106(13):1088-94. PubMed ID: 3726836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Incidence and mortality of uterine cervix cancer in Norway. When do we get organized nation-wide cytologic screening in Norway?].
    Magnus K; Langmark F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 May; 110(12):1557-9. PubMed ID: 2187277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mass screening for cervical cancer in Ostfold county of Norway 1959-77.
    Magnus K; Langmark F; Andersen A
    Int J Cancer; 1987 Mar; 39(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 3818122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cytological mass screening of a defined population.
    Kolstad P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1969; 48(S3):50-7. PubMed ID: 5380825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [No effect of organized cervix cancer screening].
    Zahl PH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(11):1302; author reply 1302. PubMed ID: 18511980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The distribution and characteristics of carcinoma of the cervix uteri in Lue Yang County].
    Zhang JM
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 1986 Dec; 7(6):343-5. PubMed ID: 3815495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Present status of mass screening of cancer of the uterine cervix].
    Kutsuzawa T; Moriya S; Okubo H; Sakuragi N; Ichinohe K
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1986 Jul; 61(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 3758914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
    Day NE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mass screening in Sweden for cancer of the uterine cervix: effect on incidence and mortality. An overview.
    Kjellgren O
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1986; 22(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 3770533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix].
    Berget A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1975 Jul; 137(27):1558-9. PubMed ID: 1145871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Report on a three-county cervical cancer screening project.
    Whitlock NH; Long SE; Kuemmerer JM
    J S C Med Assoc; 1972 Jun; 68(6):237-46. PubMed ID: 4504050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Importance of cancer of the cervix in Cataluña: considerations on an eventual screening program].
    Spagnolo de la Torre E; Segura Benedicto A; Vila Macau R; Andrés Martínez J; Sans Menéndez S
    Med Clin (Barc); 1984 Jan; 82(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6708615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the impact of screening for cancer of the cervix.
    Miller AB
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):149-60. PubMed ID: 3570400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Studies of screening, detection and mortality rates in mass screening for uterine cervical cancer in Shimane prefecture].
    Takahashi K; Moriyama M; Takamiya O; Shibukawa T; Iwanari O; Matsunaga I; Kitao M
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Mar; 37(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 3981047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Epidemiology of cancer of the cervix uteri (author's transl)].
    Sachs H; Hasche C
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1974 Nov; 34(11):921-30. PubMed ID: 4435345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Mortality from cancer of the cervix in Chile (author's transl)].
    Dabancens A; Pasternak S
    Rev Med Chil; 1979 May; 107(5):447-51. PubMed ID: 515590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cancer screening programs. I. Epidemiology and natural history of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1976 Jun; 114(11):1003-12. PubMed ID: 776378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.