These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5559714)

  • 1. Improvements of radiological image quality.
    Bouwers A
    Radiologe; 1971 Jun; 11(6):230-1. PubMed ID: 5559714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image quality.
    Rossmann K
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1969 Dec; 7(3):419-33. PubMed ID: 5382257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Improvement of the quality of the image of the light amplifiers by spectrum correction. (magenta filter)].
    Cojan P; Turpyn P
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1967; 10(9):717-22. PubMed ID: 5597362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Optic systems for image amplifiers].
    Becker J
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1972; ():Suppl:142-4. PubMed ID: 4341175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The role of optics in radiodiagnosis].
    Bouwers A
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1965 Oct; 46(10):652-7. PubMed ID: 5858179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The image and its influence on quantitative radiological data.
    Kundel HL; Revesz G; Ziskin MC; Shea FJ
    Invest Radiol; 1972; 7(4):187-205. PubMed ID: 5070786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative method of evaluating focused collimators.
    Wyper DJ; Gillespie FC
    J Nucl Med; 1971 May; 12(5):197-203. PubMed ID: 5580833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Method of coherent optical processing of bronchograms].
    Mamiliaev RM; Kirillov SA; Shlychkov VI; Shukin IV
    Med Tekh; 1984; (2):16-8. PubMed ID: 6727618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The spatial frequency spectrum: a means for studying the quality of radiographic imaging systems.
    Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1968 Jan; 90(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 5635132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Reproduction of roentgen pictures].
    Derlath S
    Dtsch Med J; 1971 May; 22(10):325-9. PubMed ID: 5556905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [An electronic-optic amplifier in combination with roentgenocinematography in the diagnosis of diseases of the gallbladder].
    Petrova IS
    Vrach Delo; 1966 Apr; 4():133-4. PubMed ID: 5990528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modulation transfer function for radioisotope imaging systems. ACRH-29.
    Bck RN
    ACRH Rep; 1968 Mar; ():6-13. PubMed ID: 5734635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary x-ray dodging.
    Edholm PR; Jacobson B
    Radiology; 1971 Jun; 99(3):694-6. PubMed ID: 5578717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Source to image receptor distance.
    Brennan PC; O'Leary D
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 79(939):266; author reply 266-7. PubMed ID: 16498045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Accuracy of contact-free plotting of the cross-sectional contour of a body using an optical range finder].
    Merkle K; Polbennikova OM
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1982 Jan; 27(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 7057697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An optical apparatus for reproducing surface outlines of body cross-sections.
    Clayton CB; Thompson DJ
    Br J Radiol; 1970 Jul; 43(511):489-92. PubMed ID: 5429091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [On the image quality in radiology. VI: comparison of image quality in various image-producing systems].
    Angerstein W; Stargardt A
    Rontgenpraxis; 1968 Aug; 21(8):191-6 contd. PubMed ID: 5687228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical density changes in dry-processed films.
    Al Khalifah K; Brindhaban A; Al Baloul G; Al Bather F; Abdulgafoor M
    Radiol Technol; 2007; 79(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 17848529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of the depth effect of tomographic and section imaging devices.
    Muehllehner G; Hashmi Z
    Phys Med Biol; 1972 Mar; 17(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 5072550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective foca spot size.
    Milne EN; McIlmoyle G; Moores BM
    Invest Radiol; 1972; 7(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 5025429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.