These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5560462)

  • 21. Structural analysis of hyperbaric speech under three gases.
    Maitland G; Findling A
    Aerosp Med; 1974 Apr; 45(4):380-5. PubMed ID: 4821732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automatic speech recognition using psychoacoustic models.
    Zwicker E; Terhardt E; Paulus E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Feb; 65(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 489818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prosody recognition in adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders: from psychoacoustics to cognition.
    Globerson E; Amir N; Kishon-Rabin L; Golan O
    Autism Res; 2015 Apr; 8(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 25428545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of room absorption on human vocal output in multitalker situations.
    Nijs L; Saher K; den Ouden D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):803-13. PubMed ID: 18247885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of compact disk recording protocols on reliability and comparability of speech audiometry outcomes: acoustic analysis.
    Di Berardino F; Tognola G; Paglialonga A; Alpini D; Grandori F; Cesarani A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Aug; 124(8):859-63. PubMed ID: 20441674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A simulation framework for auditory discrimination experiments: Revealing the importance of across-frequency processing in speech perception.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2708. PubMed ID: 27250164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Results from a psychoacoustic model-based strategy for the nucleus-24 and freedom cochlear implants.
    Büchner A; Nogueira W; Edler B; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 18223445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acoustical Society of America 131st meeting. Indianapolis, Indiana, 13-17 May 1996. Abstracts.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Apr; 99(4 Pt 2):2449-608. PubMed ID: 8909587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Psychoacoustic tests for the evaluation of speech perception ability.
    Risberg A; Agelfors E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (Suppl 8):210-5. PubMed ID: 299107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 138th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. Columbus, Ohio, USA. 1-5 November 1999. Abstracts.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 2):2115-310. PubMed ID: 10555521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relationship between intraoperative eCAP thresholds and postoperative psychoacoustic levels as a prognostic tool in evaluating the rehabilitation of cochlear implantees.
    Basta D; Dahme A; Todt I; Ernst A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 17264474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Individual differences in the processing of speech and nonspeech sounds by normal-hearing listeners.
    Surprenant AM; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2085-95. PubMed ID: 11681386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acoustics in human communications: room acoustics, music, and speech.
    Schroeder MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Jul; 68(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 6446573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Envelope and intensity based prediction of psychoacoustic masking and speech intelligibility.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1023. PubMed ID: 27586734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of a device to measure the degree of visual distortion encountered in underwater diving.
    Croussore MS; Gruber JJ
    Res Q; 1975 Dec; 46(4):428-40. PubMed ID: 1061220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Citation to Franklin S. Cooper.
    Liberman AM; Mattingly IG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1975; 58 suppl 1():Suppl preceeding S79. PubMed ID: 1104692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Major and minor music compared to excited and subdued speech.
    Bowling DL; Gill K; Choi JD; Prinz J; Purves D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):491-503. PubMed ID: 20058994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modeling the voice source in terms of spectral slopes.
    Garellek M; Samlan R; Gerratt BR; Kreiman J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1404-10. PubMed ID: 27036277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.