These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5562)

  • 1. Graft-vs-host reactions in F1 mice induced by parental lymphoid cells: nature of recruited F1 cells.
    Romano TJ; Ponzio NM; Thorbecke GJ
    J Immunol; 1976 Jun; 116(6):1618-23. PubMed ID: 5562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (pI:C) on the graft-vs-host (GVH) reaction. II. Increased NK-mediated rejection on C57BL/6 lymphocytes by (C57BL/6 X A)F1 mice.
    Peres A; Nestel FP; Seemayer TA; Lapp WS
    J Immunol; 1986 Dec; 137(11):3420-7. PubMed ID: 3537120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mutual recognition of parental and F1 lymphocytes. II. Analysis of graft-vs-host-induced suppressor cell activity for T cell-mediated lympholysis to trinitrophenyl self and alloantigens.
    Polisson RP; Shearer GM
    J Immunol; 1980 Oct; 125(4):1865-61. PubMed ID: 6967920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of murine T lymphocyte markers during the early phases of GvH-associated suppression of cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses.
    Hurtenbach U; Shearer GM
    J Immunol; 1983 Apr; 130(4):1561-6. PubMed ID: 6220057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of the cells proliferating in parent versus F hybrid mixed lymphocyte culture.
    Piguet PF; Dewey HK; Vassalli P
    J Exp Med; 1975 Apr; 141(4):775-87. PubMed ID: 1092790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of the age of donors and recipients on the regional graft-versus-host reaction in mice.
    Skowron-Cendrzak A; Kubera M; Bubak-Satora M; Godowicz W
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1991; 39(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 1810211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of immunosuppression generated by the graft-versus-host reaction. II. Characterization of the suppression cell and its mechanism of action.
    Shand FL
    Immunology; 1976 Dec; 31(6):943-51. PubMed ID: 11181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kinetics of natural killer cell cytotoxicity during the graft-versus-host reaction. Relationship between natural killer cell activity, T and B cell activity, and development of histopathological alterations.
    Ghayur T; Seemayer TA; Lapp WS
    Transplantation; 1987 Aug; 44(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 3498241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loss of proliferative capacity and T cell immune development potential by bone marrow from mice undergoing a graft-vs-host reaction.
    Iwasaki T; Fujiwara H; Iwasaki T; Shearer GM
    J Immunol; 1986 Nov; 137(10):3100-8. PubMed ID: 2945856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regulation of cell-mediated cytotoxicity. III. Synergism of cortico-resistant with anti-thymocyte serum-resistant splenic T cells in the generation of cytotoxic lymphocytes in graft-vs-host reactions.
    Babu UM; Sabbadini E
    J Immunol; 1977 Aug; 119(2):781-5. PubMed ID: 18543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Induction of a glucocorticoid-sensitive F1-anti-parental mechanism that affects engraftment during graft-versus-host disease.
    You-Ten KE; Seemayer TA; Wisse B; Bertley FM; Lapp WS
    J Immunol; 1995 Jul; 155(1):172-80. PubMed ID: 7602093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of L3T4+ and Lyt-2+ donor cells in graft-versus-host immune deficiency induced across a class I, class II, or whole H-2 difference.
    Moser M; Sharrow SO; Shearer GM
    J Immunol; 1988 Apr; 140(8):2600-8. PubMed ID: 3258615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immunosuppression of normal lymphoid cells by serum from mice undergoing chronic graft-vs-host disease.
    McMaster R; Levy JG
    J Immunol; 1975 Nov; 115(5):1400-3. PubMed ID: 240891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The graft-versus-host reaction and immune function. IV. B cell functional defect associated with a depletion of splenic colony-forming units in marrow of graft-versus-host-reactive mice.
    Seddik M; Seemayer TA; Lapp WS
    Transplantation; 1986 Feb; 41(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 3511585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid on the graft-versus-host reaction. III: Increased severity of the reaction with delayed pI:C treatment.
    Peres A; Amlani S; Kornbluth M; Seemayer TA; Lapp WS
    Transplantation; 1989 Jul; 48(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 2749889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of the treatment of parental cells in vitro with anti-T antibody on bone marrow transplantation in F1 hybrid mice.
    Hrubá A; Paluska E; Fricová V; Fiala J
    Folia Biol (Praha); 1980; 26(5):338-50. PubMed ID: 7002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Activation and suppression of graft-vs-host reactions by cyclophosphamide.
    Wander RH; Hilgard HR
    J Immunol; 1981 Mar; 126(3):901-4. PubMed ID: 7462635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attempts at standardization of lupus-like graft-vs-host disease: inadvertent repopulation by DBA/2 spleen cells of H-2-different nonirradiated F1 mice.
    Van Rappard-Van Der Veen FM; Radaszkiewicz T; Terraneo L; Gleichmann E
    J Immunol; 1983 Jun; 130(6):2693-701. PubMed ID: 6602176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subpopulations of mouse T lymphocytes. II. Suppression of graft-vs.-host reactions by naturally proliferating splenic T cells.
    Moorhead JW
    Eur J Immunol; 1978 Mar; 8(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 26575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impairment of graft versus host reactivity in pregnant mice.
    Nicklin S; Billington WD
    Clin Exp Immunol; 1982 Jul; 49(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 7127896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.