These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. A simple method of producing a monolayer of cervical cells for digital image processing. Rosenthal DL; Stern E; McLatchie C; Wu A; Lagasse LD; Wall R; Castleman KR Anal Quant Cytol; 1979; 1(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 396838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Methods of endocervical cytodiagnosis]. Hilgarth M; Schumann K Z Allgemeinmed; 1970 Sep; 46(26):1303-8. PubMed ID: 5522829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A trial of the Hollister endocervical aspirator. Bernstein JM; Dolan LJ Practitioner; 1970 Mar; 204(221):433-5. PubMed ID: 5434404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Method of detection of pathological changes by cytodiagnosis in the uterine-vaginal junction]. Tajima M; Yamagishi K Saishin Igaku; 1968 Mar; 23(3):655-70. PubMed ID: 5684922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The significance of cytodiagnosis as a screening method in the domain of early diagnosis of cervix cancer and its early stages for the general practioner]. Bötzelen HP; Meyer K Z Allgemeinmed; 1964 Dec; 40(36):1549-51. PubMed ID: 5889485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Microinvasive cervical cancer after five negative Papanicolaou smears. Erozan Y; Rosenshein NB; Parmley TH; Woodruff JD Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3 Suppl):82s. PubMed ID: 6877718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method]. Ivanov S Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The first reports of Daniel and Babès, in 1927, on the diagnosis of cancer of the uterine cervix with smears. (Rumanian method)]. Babes LM Gynecol Prat; 1963; 14(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 5339784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A membrane cytologic technique for assessing the extent of ectocervical carcinoma using the tenovus applicator. Evans DM; McCormack J; Sanerkin NG; Ponsford P; Jones J Acta Cytol; 1969 Mar; 13(3):119-21. PubMed ID: 5253718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Efficacy of cytodiagnosis of cervix cancer during prophylactic examinations]. Gladysheva VA; Chernova VD; Ivanova AV Lab Delo; 1982; (9):519-21. PubMed ID: 6183511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A nucleus-detection programme. Burn GP Med Biol Eng; 1972 Nov; 10(6):776-83. PubMed ID: 4636043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Smears from the cervix. Cancer cell detection. Wells AH; Kundel DW; Helwig KL; Michaelis DL; Goldschmidt VG Minn Med; 1968 Jan; 51(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 5636225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Considerations on suspicious colpocytological findings. Comparative study of fluorescence microscopy and the Papanicolau method]. Caramazza G; Guerresi E; Faccioli G Riv Ital Ginecol; 1967 Oct; 51(10):627-61. PubMed ID: 4179149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [On the significance of cytodiagnosis for the general practitioner as the research method in the field of early recognition of cervix uteri neoplasms and their early stages]. Bötzelen HP; Meyer K Landarzt; 1964 Dec; 40(36):1549-51. PubMed ID: 5890276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fine structure of human nuclear chromatins in interphase as observed by polarized dark-field oblique-illumination microscope. Sato A Acta Cytol; 1969 Apr; 13(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 5253404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Possibilities and limitations of cytodiagnosis of irradiated neoplasms of the uterine cervix]. Marsan C Bull Fed Soc Gynecol Obstet Lang Fr; 1971; 23(2):238-40. PubMed ID: 5121093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]