These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5567148)
21. Studies on sensory feedback. 3. The effects of display gain on tracking performance. Chase RA; Cullen JK; Openshaw JW; Sullivan SA Q J Exp Psychol; 1965 Aug; 17(3):193-208. PubMed ID: 5827075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Attentional strategies and the visual control of discrete movements. McFarquhar RH; Newell KM Acta Psychol (Amst); 1984 Oct; 57(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 6524430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Response time to a first signal as a function of time relationship to a second signal and mode of presentation. Burns MM; Moskowitz H Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Jun; 32(3):811-6. PubMed ID: 5557018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Error-induced inhibition in a serial reaction time task. Burns JT J Exp Psychol; 1971 Sep; 90(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 5096123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Relative effects of display mode and input function on tracking performance. Christ RE; Newton RR J Exp Psychol; 1970 Aug; 85(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 5482025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual and tactile tracking with step commands. NASA CR-623. Bliss JC; Brody WR; Lane B NASA Contract Rep NASA CR; 1967 Feb; ():119-61. PubMed ID: 5297962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of feedback in manual tracking of visual targets. Hocherman S; Levy H Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 2):1235-48. PubMed ID: 10939075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Auditorily paced keytapping performance during synchronous, decreased, and delayed visual feedback. Karlovich RS; Graham JT Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Jun; 26(3):731-43. PubMed ID: 5657713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Visual flight feedback as a determiner of motor response recognition. Newell KM Res Q; 1975 May; 46(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 1056072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Effect of Practice and Visual Feedback on Oral-Diadochokinetic Rates for Younger and Older Adults. Ben-David BM; Icht M Lang Speech; 2018 Mar; 61(1):113-134. PubMed ID: 28610466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Partial visual feedback of component motions as a function of difficulty of motor control. Gould JD; Schaffer A J Exp Psychol; 1965 Dec; 70(6):564-9. PubMed ID: 5839509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of practice on some aspects of human tracking performance under two sensory feedback conditions. Carrie JR J Neurol Sci; 1967; 5(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 6073216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The cause of control movements in a tracking task. Marken R Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Dec; 51(3 Pt 1):755-8. PubMed ID: 7208219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cerebellar dyssynergia in humans--a quantitative analysis. Miller RG; Freund HJ Ann Neurol; 1980 Dec; 8(6):574-9. PubMed ID: 7212645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of randomly delayed visual and auditory feedback on keying performance. Long J Ergonomics; 1975 May; 18(3):337-47. PubMed ID: 1193082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Relation between programming time and duration of the response being programmed. Klapp ST; Erwin CI J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):591-8. PubMed ID: 1011008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]