These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5571727)

  • 1. [Influence of missing intestinal flora on the digestibilty of differently sterilized diet in rats and mice].
    Hiller HH; Schoen A
    Z Tierphysiol Tierernahr Futtermittelkd; 1971 Aug; 28(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 5571727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Influence of lack of intestinal flora on the digestibility of a variously sterilized rat- and mouse-raising diet in rats].
    Hiller HH; Schoen A
    Z Tierphysiol Tierernahr Futtermittelkd; 1971 Aug; 28(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 5111209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Investigation of feed for gnotobiotic laboratory animals. Effect of bacterial contents of pasteurized feed on intestinal flora and resistance].
    Juhr NC; Gruber F
    Z Versuchstierkd; 1971; 13(5):267-74. PubMed ID: 5169594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studies on the effect of the gut microflora on dietary nitrogen digestibility in pigs.
    Ratcliffe B; Low AG
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1985; 181():115-8. PubMed ID: 4022966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of gut micro-organisms on utilization of dietary protein.
    Salter DN
    Proc Nutr Soc; 1973 Sep; 32(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 4598412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Nutritional requirements of defined laboratory animals].
    Udes H
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1971 Dec; 84(23):468-72. PubMed ID: 4945312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of bioisolation and the intestinal flora of mice upon evaluation of an Apollo diet.
    Luckey TD; Bengson MH; Kaplan H
    Aerosp Med; 1974 May; 45(5):509-18. PubMed ID: 4598608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The colonisation of the gut "gnotoxenic" rats and mice with 10 strains of stricty anaerobic bacteria. The influence of the host and of its diet].
    Ducluzeau R; Raibaud P; Ladiré M; Riottot M; Chopin A
    Ann Microbiol (Paris); 1973 Dec; 124(4):517-32. PubMed ID: 4792487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of microbiota on metabolic fecal nitrogen in rats.
    Harmon BG; Becker DE; Jensen AH; Baker DH
    J Nutr; 1968 Nov; 96(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 5725894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of viscosity on digestion of nutrients in conventional and germ-free chicks.
    Langhout DJ; Schutte JB; de Jong J; Sloetjes H; Verstegen MW; Tamminga S
    Br J Nutr; 2000 May; 83(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 10953678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparative study of classic sterilization and irradiation on a diet to be fed to rats].
    Ferrando R; Pantaléon J; Fromageot D
    Ann Nutr Aliment; 1968; 22(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 5665211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Feed for SPF experimental animals. Influence of residual microbial contents of a pasteurized feed on the intestinal flora and resistance].
    Juhr NC; Gruber F
    Z Versuchstierkd; 1971; 13(5):267-74. PubMed ID: 5151065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neutralization of intestinal flora and development of germ-free--like characteristics in antibiotic treated conventional rats.
    Wiseman RF; Gordon HA; Scott T
    J Lab Clin Med; 1971 Nov; 78(5):834-5. PubMed ID: 5128881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of the antigenic stimuli derived from the diet and microbial flora on immunoglobulin levels.
    Umehara K; Tazume S; Hashimoto K; Sasaki S
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1985; 181():351-3. PubMed ID: 4022996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Commercially obtaining mice and rats not contaminated by specific pathogenic organisms, bacteriological control of feeding, animal growth].
    Bonnod J; de Saint-Aubert G; Forissier P
    Bibl Microbiol; 1969; 7():69-80. PubMed ID: 5407155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Normal bacterial flora and its balancing effects, with some reference to germ-free animal].
    Tazume S; Ozawa A; Sasaki S
    Nihon Rinsho; 1981 Jun; 39(6):2252-9. PubMed ID: 7031301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Studies on the influence of bacteria and intestinal helminths of host, taking in consideration germ-free animals. II. Studies on the influence of bacteria on the development of helminths in germ-free animals].
    Przyjalkowski Z
    Wiad Parazytol; 1969; 15(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 4978124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human flora-associated (HFA) animals as a model for studying the role of intestinal flora in human health and disease.
    Hirayama K; Itoh K
    Curr Issues Intest Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 6(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 16107039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of intestinal flora and of a monoculture of E. coli on the development of intestinal and muscular Trichinella spiralis in mice.
    Przyjalkowski Z
    Bull Acad Pol Sci Biol; 1968; 16(7):433-7. PubMed ID: 4884943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of lactose and mode of sterilization of a lactose diet on mineral metabolism in germ-free and conventional rats.
    Andrieux C; Guéguen L; Sacquet E
    Reprod Nutr Dev (1980); 1980; 20(1A):119-38. PubMed ID: 7349413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.