These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Uricosuric action of cholecystographic agents. A possible factor in nephrotoxicity. Mudge GH N Engl J Med; 1971 Apr; 284(17):929-33. PubMed ID: 5551801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Uricosuric effect of radiocontrast agents. A study in man of four commonly used preparations. Postlethwaite AE; Kelley WN Ann Intern Med; 1971 Jun; 74(6):845-52. PubMed ID: 5580635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Problems related to the radiographic study of the biliary tract using oral or intravenous contrast media. Main side effects and biochemical changes induced by the administration of contrast media]. Limido G Minerva Dietol Gastroenterol; 1984; 30(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 6374500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Kidney repercussions of bile duct contrast media administration]. Billis A; Dimopoulos C; Giamarellou H; Zoubouli I; Papadimitriou A; Sagiorgis G; Kaniouras N; Scouteris M; Daikos G J Urol Nephrol (Paris); 1973 Dec; 79(12 Pt 2):447-50. PubMed ID: 4804417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The uricosuric action of contrast media used for the opacification of bile ducts (apropos of 27 cases)]. Billis A; Dimopoulos C; Giamarellou H; Zoumbouli I; Papadimitriou A; Sagiorgis G; Kaniouras N; Scouteris M; Daïcos G Ann Med Interne (Paris); 1973 Dec; 124(12):853-62. PubMed ID: 4598722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical comparison of tyropanoate sodium, ipodate sodium, and iopanoic acid. Russell JG; Frederick PR Radiology; 1974 Sep; 112(3):519-23. PubMed ID: 4843279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Residual contrast medium in the intestines and side effects during cholecystography. A comparison between some contrast media in current use and a new medium. Eriksson S; Saltzman GF Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1970 Jan; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 5447107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative trial of three oral cholecystographic contrast media--iocetamic acid, iopanoic acid and sodium ipodate. Cargill A; Hately W Br J Radiol; 1981 Jan; 54(637):79-80. PubMed ID: 6449974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of drugs on the uptake of uric acid by separated renal tubules of the rabbit. Kippen I; Klinenberg JR Adv Exp Med Biol; 1977; 76B():114-6. PubMed ID: 855739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Physiologic bases of the treatment of gout]. Gascon J Union Med Can; 1976 Apr; 105(4):610-5. PubMed ID: 997014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Results obtained in comparative radiographie, clinical and clinical-chemical studies in iocetamic acid (DRC 1201) and iopanoic acid. Hekster RE Radiol Clin Biol; 1968; 37(6):338-52. PubMed ID: 5714064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The effect of diarrhea on gallbladder opacification during oral cholecystography: comparison of two cholecystographic agents (author's transl)]. Fukuda K; Nanjo M; Harada J; Sekiya T; Kanehira Y; Anno I; Takayama M; Watanabe H; Yamada T; Yamaguchi M; Tada S Rinsho Hoshasen; 1979 Mar; 24(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 547079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A double-blind study of ipodate and the non-diagnostic cholecystogram. Newman DE; Fellows KE J Can Assoc Radiol; 1970 Sep; 21(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 4920246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The combined use of oral cholecystopaque media and iodipamide. Goergen T; Goldberger LE; Berk RN Radiology; 1974 Jun; 111(3):543-8. PubMed ID: 4828985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]