These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 557359)

  • 1. Vulnerability and conditioning in relation to the human menstrual cycle.
    Vila J; Beech HR
    Br J Soc Clin Psychol; 1977 Feb; 16(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 557359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Susceptibility to the acquisition of a conditioned response in relation to the menstrual cycle.
    Asso D; Beech HR
    J Psychosom Res; 1975; 19(5-6):337-44. PubMed ID: 1240145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vulnerability and defensive reactions in relation to the human menstrual cycle.
    Vila J; Beech HR
    Br J Soc Clin Psychol; 1978 Feb; 17(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 620110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Autonomic reactivity in the premenstrual phase.
    Strauss B; Schultheiss M; Cohen R
    Br J Clin Psychol; 1983 Feb; 22 Pt 1():1-9. PubMed ID: 6682000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The premise of equipotentiality in human classical conditioning: conditioned electrodermal responses to potentially phobic stimuli.
    Ohman A; Fredrikson M; Hugdahl K; Rimmö PA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1976 Dec; 105(4):313-37. PubMed ID: 1003120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conditioned diminution of the unconditioned skin conductance response.
    Knight DC; Lewis EP; Wood KH
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 125(4):626-31. PubMed ID: 21688887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One-trial learning and superior resistance to extinction of autonomic responses conditioned to potentially phobic stimuli.
    Ohman A; Eriksson A; Olofsson C
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1975 Feb; 88(2):619-27. PubMed ID: 1171119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex differences in conditioned stimulus discrimination during context-dependent fear learning and its retrieval in humans: the role of biological sex, contraceptives and menstrual cycle phases.
    Lonsdorf TB; Haaker J; Schümann D; Sommer T; Bayer J; Brassen S; Bunzeck N; Gamer M; Kalisch R
    J Psychiatry Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 40(6):368-75. PubMed ID: 26107163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive factors and CS-UCS interval effects in the differential conditioning and extinction of skin conductance responses.
    Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE
    Biol Psychol; 1980 Jun; 10(4):283-98. PubMed ID: 7248399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The possible relation of the menstrual cycle to susceptibility to fear acquisition.
    van der Molen GM; Merckelbach H; van den Hout MA
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1988 Jun; 19(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 3209697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phobias and preparedness: phobic versus neutral pictures as conditioned stimuli for human autonomic responses.
    Ohman A; Erixon G; Löfberg I
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1975 Feb; 84(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 1110271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociation of neuronal, electrodermal, and evaluative responses in disgust extinction.
    Klucken T; Schweckendiek J; Merz CJ; Vaitl D; Stark R
    Behav Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 127(3):380-6. PubMed ID: 23731074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluative differential conditioning of disgust: a sticky form of relational learning that is resistant to extinction.
    Olatunji BO; Forsyth JP; Cherian A
    J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(6):820-34. PubMed ID: 17158024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Greater resistance to extinction of electrodermal responses conditioned to potentially phobic CSs: a noncognitive process?
    Dawson ME; Schell AM; Banis HT
    Psychophysiology; 1986 Sep; 23(5):552-61. PubMed ID: 3809362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Left hemisphere advantage for classical conditioning to auditory verbal CSs: effects of nonattended extinction.
    Saban S; Hugdahl K; Stormark KM; Hammerborg D
    Psychophysiology; 1997 Sep; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 9299911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of continuous and partial reinforcement on the acquisition and extinction of human conditioned fear.
    Grady AK; Bowen KH; Hyde AT; Totsch SK; Knight DC
    Behav Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 130(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 26692449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Skin Conductance Responses and Neural Activations During Fear Conditioning and Extinction Recall Across Anxiety Disorders.
    Marin MF; Zsido RG; Song H; Lasko NB; Killgore WDS; Rauch SL; Simon NM; Milad MR
    JAMA Psychiatry; 2017 Jun; 74(6):622-631. PubMed ID: 28403387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No evidence for blocking the return of fear by disrupting reconsolidation prior to extinction learning.
    Klucken T; Kruse O; Schweckendiek J; Kuepper Y; Mueller EM; Hennig J; Stark R
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():112-22. PubMed ID: 27111105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced return of threat expectancy after counterconditioning verus extinction.
    Kang S; Vervliet B; Engelhard IM; van Dis EAM; Hagenaars MA
    Behav Res Ther; 2018 Sep; 108():78-84. PubMed ID: 30064009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classical conditioning after cerebellar lesions in humans.
    Daum I; Schugens MM; Ackermann H; Lutzenberger W; Dichgans J; Birbaumer N
    Behav Neurosci; 1993 Oct; 107(5):748-56. PubMed ID: 8280385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.