These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5577172)
1. Perceptual deficit due to division of attention between memory and perception. Shulman HG; Greenberg SN J Exp Psychol; 1971 May; 88(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 5577172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory codability and the short-term retention of visual information. Nickerson RS J Exp Psychol; 1972 Oct; 95(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 5071917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Serial and parallel encoding processes in memory and visual search. Connor JM J Exp Psychol; 1972 Dec; 96(2):363-70. PubMed ID: 4645964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic and visual coding in primary and secondary memory. Laughery KR; Welte JW; Spector A J Exp Psychol; 1973 Aug; 99(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 4742546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Words and pictures in an STM task. Ternes W; Yuille JC J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 5083133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Modality differences in recognition memory for words and their attributes. Kirsner K J Exp Psychol; 1974 Apr; 102(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 4824300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A new look at the new look: perceptual defense and vigilance. Erdelyi MH Psychol Rev; 1974 Jan; 81(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 4812878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Memory for physical and semantic features of visual material in a shadowing task. Hall R; Swane D; Jenkins RA J Exp Psychol; 1973 Oct; 100(2):426-8. PubMed ID: 4745467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of modality and similarity on context recall. Chi MT; Chase WG J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):219-22. PubMed ID: 5083126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Processing capacity in a letter-matching task. Comstock EM J Exp Psychol; 1973 Sep; 100(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 4744501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Choice reaction time: the location of auditory and visual similarity. Clement DE; Hawkins HL; Hosking KE Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 4742383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Memory in a bisensory selective attention task. Hall R; Swane D Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 Aug; 25(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 4807291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Familiarity effects in visual information processing. Krueger LE Psychol Bull; 1975 Nov; 82(6):949-74. PubMed ID: 1103203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A developmental study of visual selective attention. Pick AD; Christy MD; Frankel GW J Exp Child Psychol; 1972 Oct; 14(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 4651274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns. Leeuwenberg EL Am J Psychol; 1971 Sep; 84(3):307-49. PubMed ID: 5142580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Strategies and models of selective attention. Treisman AM Psychol Rev; 1969 May; 76(3):282-99. PubMed ID: 4893203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception. Massaro DW Psychol Rev; 1972 Mar; 79(2):124-45. PubMed ID: 5024158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Search time as a function of context letter frequency. Latimer CR Perception; 1972; 1(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 4680926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]