These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5581904)
21. Proposal for public archive draws support, criticism. Travis K J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(19):1416. PubMed ID: 15467028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Role of the National Cancer Institute in the development of cancer centers. I. National Cancer Institute center programs. Saunders JP Cancer; 1972 Apr; 29(4):882-7. PubMed ID: 5017350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. NIH grants. Peer review reforms get good review. Marshall E Science; 1994 Jul; 265(5171):467. PubMed ID: 8036487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers. Shalev M Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. NIH panel urges overhaul of the rating system for grants. Marshall E Science; 1996 May; 272(5266):1257. PubMed ID: 8650533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Shattuck lecture--will partisan politics determine the nature and quality of health care? An open letter to President Nixon and the Democratic Nominee. Anlyan WG N Engl J Med; 1972 Jun; 286(22):1184-6. PubMed ID: 5021333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Varmus speaks out on need to boost clinical research. Gavaghan H Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6502):118. PubMed ID: 7969431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. National Institutes of Health. Two strikes and you're out, grant applicants learn. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):358. PubMed ID: 18927363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health. Kirschstein RL Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. NIH needs a makeover. Dey SK Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Looking to NSF as an NIH model. Yost WA Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6046):1093. PubMed ID: 21868657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Peer review. NIH urged to focus on new ideas, new applicants. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5867):1169. PubMed ID: 18309051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]