343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5584449)
1. [The chief physician has to give the expert testimony in person].
Med Monatsschr; 1967 Apr; 21(4):192. PubMed ID: 5584449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Refusal of medical expert. A critical observation].
Stern M
Munch Med Wochenschr; 1969 Mar; 111(12):673-7. PubMed ID: 5819272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Certificates from the family physician].
Marx HH
Landarzt; 1968 May; 44(13):625-6. PubMed ID: 5716443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Medical jurisdiction in the literature 1970].
Schulz G
Med Klin; 1971 Jun; 66(23):860-7. PubMed ID: 4936730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The fiscal evaluation of various medical activities].
Lohmeyer H
Med Klin; 1967 Jul; 62(28):1100-2. PubMed ID: 5592487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Surgery between law and conscience].
Wachsmuth W
Chirurg; 1976 Sep; 47(9):469-74. PubMed ID: 991691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Chief medical expert].
Friederichs H
Med Klin; 1972 Jan; 67(4):140-1. PubMed ID: 5060141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The physician's obligation to give evidence and expert testimony].
Jessnitzer K
Med Klin; 1967 Sep; 62(35):1363-7. PubMed ID: 5593021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Professional secrecy and the right of the physician to refuse testimony].
Wittenbeck S
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1971 Jul; 65(13):637-41. PubMed ID: 5116457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Medical private expert testimony and its evaluation].
Groemig H
Med Monatsschr; 1972 Dec; 26(12):588-90. PubMed ID: 4663636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [On the problem of psychiatric expert testimony in court].
Cabanis D
Hippokrates; 1966 May; 37(10):405-8. PubMed ID: 5984964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Specific-type conclusion reports as the main occupational task of the chief medical officer].
Schmeicher R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1968 May; 93(22):1118-9. PubMed ID: 5655851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Behavior of the physician in police acts in hospital].
Baader E
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1975 Feb; 100(9):442. PubMed ID: 1116472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Significance of medical testimony in social court trials. 1. Significance of medical testimony].
Hauffe R
Fortschr Med; 1973 Nov; 91(33):1289-90. PubMed ID: 4765763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Crises in the corporation of medical expert testimony].
Leithoff H
Lebensversicher Med; 1971 Nov; 23(6):121-4. PubMed ID: 4400589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The physician as the expert in civil legal suits].
Weimar W
Ther Ggw; 1981 Aug; 120(8):748-52. PubMed ID: 7292360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Medical expert testimony in the accident insurance].
Lob A
Landarzt; 1968 May; 44(13):637-43. PubMed ID: 5716445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Compensation for medical expert testimony].
Jessnitzer K
Med Klin; 1968 Feb; 63(6):231-5. PubMed ID: 5667026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [On work division in expert testimony].
Kohlhaas M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1969 Jan; 94(5):237-8. PubMed ID: 5762230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Expert testimony in the probation of alcoholics].
Rieger HJ
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1972 Nov; 97(46):1803. PubMed ID: 4634901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
