These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. [Comparative studies of mammography using soft ray technic and isodens method]. Höffken W; Gajewski H Radiologe; 1966 Oct; 6(10):407-13. PubMed ID: 5995218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Mammography, methods and efficiency. Short report]. Lotz K; Tautz M Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1971; 12(1):139-40. PubMed ID: 5093065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. No males in mammography. Volk B Radiol Technol; 1989; 60(4):342. PubMed ID: 2928503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. For equality in mammography. Macerelli J Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(5):287-8. PubMed ID: 8058905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Males in mammography--a silly suggestion. Durand D Radiol Technol; 1989; 60(4):342-3. PubMed ID: 2928504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pendant mammography: a new approach to an old technique. Jabczenski A J Can Assoc Radiol; 1970 Mar; 21(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 5459934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Picture taking technique in mammography]. Gajewski H Rontgenpraxis; 1967 Aug; 20(8):177-88. PubMed ID: 5589934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Medical and physical problems of mammography. II. Studies on the optimum quality of radiation and exposure]. Barke R; Geissler S; Rosenkranz G Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1980 Feb; 21(1):20-37. PubMed ID: 7465820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]