These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5607814)

  • 1. Relationship of arm girth measurements with roentgenogrammetric and caliper measurements of subcutaneous fat at triceps and biceps in adult male volunteers.
    Singh R
    Z Morphol Anthropol; 1967; 59(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 5607814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of fat, muscle, bone, and comparison between roentgenogrammetric and somatometric methods for assessing subcutaneous fat and muscle thickness in the upper arm of adult males.
    Singh R
    Z Morphol Anthropol; 1967 Apr; 58(3):308-17. PubMed ID: 5595006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of triceps skinfold and upper arm circumference measurements taken in standard and supine positions.
    Jensen TG; Dudrick SJ; Johnston DA
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1981; 5(6):519-21. PubMed ID: 7199591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of an anthropometric estimate of the muscle and bone area in a transversal cross-section of the arm.
    de Koning FL; Binkhorst RA; Kauer JM; Thijssen HO
    Int J Sports Med; 1986 Oct; 7(5):246-9. PubMed ID: 3793331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of surface anthropometry to estimate upper-arm muscularity, including changes with body mass loss.
    Katch FI; Hortobagyi T
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1990 Oct; 52(4):591-5. PubMed ID: 2403053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of bone width in malnourished children under 5, and its inter relationship with mid arm muscle thickness, subcutaneous fat thickness and the mid upper arm girth.
    Khare M; Shrivastava DK; Puliyel JM
    Indian J Pediatr; 1992; 59(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 1398849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New norms of upper limb fat and muscle areas for assessment of nutritional status.
    Frisancho AR
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1981 Nov; 34(11):2540-5. PubMed ID: 6975564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of triceps skinfold values as measured by the plastic McGaw caliper and the Lange caliper.
    Burgert SL; Anderson CF
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1979 Jul; 32(7):1531-3. PubMed ID: 453067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Upper arm measurements of healthy neonates comparing ultrasonography and anthropometric methods.
    Pereira-da-Silva L; Veiga Gomes J; Clington A; Videira-Amaral JM; Bustamante SA
    Early Hum Dev; 1999 Mar; 54(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 10213290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold caliper measurement of subcutaneous fat tissue.
    Weits T; van der Beek EJ; Wedel M
    Int J Obes; 1986; 10(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 3531051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of upper arm measurements used in nutritional assessment.
    Burgert SL; Anderson CF
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1979 Oct; 32(10):2136-42. PubMed ID: 484532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Midarm muscle volume: a suggestion.
    Jelliffe DB; Jelliffe EF
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1979 Nov; 32(11):2170-2. PubMed ID: 115308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The sonographic fat/muscle ratio.
    Fried AM; Coughlin K; Griffen WO
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Jan; 21(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 3511002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Anthropometric and nutritional study in young adults. Evaluation of submandibular skinfold thickness].
    Fleta Zaragozano J; Moreno Aznar L; Rodríguez García L; Rodríguez Martínez G; Lario Elboj A
    Nutr Hosp; 1999; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10361811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Caliper vs. Lipometer--Comparing Two Methods of Subcutaneous Body Fat Measurement by Bland-Altman Diagrams.
    Tafeit E; Kaimbacher PS; Wallner-Liebmann SJ; Reibnegger G; Cvirn G; Jürimäe J; Saar M; Maestu J; Purge P; Lätt E; Jürimäe T
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Sep; 39(3):611-5. PubMed ID: 26898056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. UAE population reference standard charts for body mass index and skinfold thickness, at ages 0-18 years.
    Abdulrazzaq YM; Nagelkerke N; Moussa MA
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2011 Nov; 62(7):692-702. PubMed ID: 21568821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anthropometrics revisited.
    Bastow MD
    Proc Nutr Soc; 1982 Sep; 41(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 6817334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of upper arm muscle and fat areas using electrical impedance measurements.
    Brown BH; Karatzas T; Nakielny R; Clarke RG
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988 Feb; 9(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 3359744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Triceps skin fold and upper arm muscle size norms for assessment of nutrition status.
    Frisancho AR
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1974 Oct; 27(10):1052-8. PubMed ID: 4419774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anthropometric and roentgenogrammetric assessment of physique and body composition of athletes specialising in throwing events.
    Sidhu LS; Kansal DK; Kanda BS
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1975 Sep; 15(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 1195714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.