These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5616713)
1. [Our clinical experience with the vacuum extractor]. Inzirillo G Minerva Ginecol; 1967 Sep; 19(18):926-7. PubMed ID: 5616713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Use of the vacuum extractor and of the forceps in our service during the last 4 years]. Boudjemaa S; Ben Cheikh TB; Haddad M Tunis Med; 1973; 51(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 4783607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Our clinical experience on the use of the vacuum-extractor. Obstetrical and pediatric considerations]. Cappello F; Mengarda G Minerva Ginecol; 1967 Sep; 19(18):923-5. PubMed ID: 5616712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Our experience in the use of forceps and vacuum extractor]. Avezzú G; Giannone R Minerva Ginecol; 1973 Jan; 25(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 4696914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Obstetrical vacuum-extractor and forceps. Indications and effects on the newborn infants]. Bonfadini Bossi E; Rella R; Fagnani D; Salini P; Console V; Onofri MP; Pezzoli G Minerva Ginecol; 1980 Apr; 32(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 7383439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [MATERNAL AND INFANTILE INJURIES FOLLOWING DELIVERY BY FORCEPS OR VACUUM EXTRACTOR]. WESPI HJ; KUSTER E Ther Umsch; 1963 Aug; 20():359-63. PubMed ID: 14054728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical evaluation of the usefulness of vacuum extractor]. Kietlińska Z; Podsiadlowska W; Stelmachów J Wiad Lek; 1969 Nov; 22(22):2033-9. PubMed ID: 5367273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Studies and comparisons of the degree of fetal distress after the use of the vacuum extractor and forceps]. Cappello F Arch Ostet Ginecol; 1968; 73(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 5742959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of the risk of injury from the use of forceps or the Malstrom vacuum extractor]. DESSARZIN D; BONO S Gynaecologia; 1963; 155():353-67. PubMed ID: 14027310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The vacuum extractor: indications and results. Clinical, radiological, ophthalmological and electroencephalographic study of infants delivered with the vacuum extractor]. Rieppi G; Tosolini GC Attual Ostet Ginecol; 1966; 12(6):854-904. PubMed ID: 5999766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of the vacuum extractor: a reappraisal. Matheson GW; Davajan V; Mishell DR Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1968; 47(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 5709214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Obstetrical vacuum extraction and forceps. Comparative study between two series of 100 cases]. Teppa PA Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez; 1967; 27(3):547-60. PubMed ID: 5609904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Forceps-vacuum extractor. Comparative study. Personal experience]. López Cabal J; Ramírez Alonso F; Tapia Nava R Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1969 Oct; 26(156):471-9. PubMed ID: 5385818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [FETAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAM IN THE PROCESS OF NORMAL AND PATHOLOGIC LABOR]. CHACHAVA KV; BUDZHIASHVILI ON; KINTRAIA PI Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1964; 40():23-9. PubMed ID: 14215037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Forceps, vacuum suction and cesarean section from the point of view of the neonatologist]. Malaguzzi Valeri O; Ottaviano S Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1976; 97(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10602689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [On retinal hemorrhage in the newborn. A comparative study after spontaneous delivery, by pneumatic extractor or by forceps]. Krauer-Mayer B Gynecol Obstet (Paris); 1966; 65(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 5934675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]