These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5628429)
1. [The central beam is completely insignificant for x-ray projection]. Büchner H Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1967 Oct; 107(4):540-52. PubMed ID: 5628429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physical principles of digital radiography. Smith CB Radiography; 1984; 50(590):41-4. PubMed ID: 6709859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Possibilities and limitations of further improvement of photographic information storage for x-ray diagnosis]. Volke C Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1969; 10(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 5358402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An estimation of the necessity for physics in the training of the radiographer. Snelling OD Rev Int Serv Sante Armees; 1965 May; 38(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 5838569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [On the low-angle scatter of x-rays]. Takahashi M Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1966 Mar; 33(1):45. PubMed ID: 5220401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Double images in plain film radiography: a motion artifact. Marinelli D; Miller WT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Dec; 147(6):1312. PubMed ID: 3490769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Determination of the error of calculation of the effective energy of combined X-ray beam]. Petrushanskiĭ MG; Kornev EA; Pishchukhin AM Med Tekh; 2006; (3):20-2. PubMed ID: 16875140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of small mass differences in roentgenography. 7. Theoretical considerations. Lysell G; Mårtensson BK; Omnell KA Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1968 Feb; 7(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 5672725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [On determination of the effective energy of mixed X-ray beam]. Petrushanskiĭ MG; Kornev EA Med Tekh; 2006; (2):46-9. PubMed ID: 16850795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Methods for the determination of the tube voltage in diagnostic radiology]. Ewen K Rontgenblatter; 1983 Jan; 36(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 6823532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Light production from intensifying screens (theoretical and experimental aspects)]. Giacomich R; Tomasini F; Bacarini L; Di Lelio A Radiol Med; 1982; 68(7-8):571-80. PubMed ID: 7134508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PHYSICS IN THE TRAINING OF RADIOGRAPHERS--EXAMINATION STANDARDS. GREGORY C Radiography; 1965 Feb; 31():29-32. PubMed ID: 14255473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. PROBLEMS IN TEACHING PHYSICS TO RADIOGRAPHERS. WILLIAMS JA Radiography; 1965 Feb; 31():27-8. PubMed ID: 14255472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. AN ESTIMATION OF THE NECESSITY FOR PHYSICS IN THE TRAINING OF THE RADIOGRAPHER. SNELLING OD Radiol Technol; 1965 Mar; 36():302-8. PubMed ID: 14276945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In what direction is radiologic technology developing? Panel. Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(3 Suppl):87-110. PubMed ID: 468508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Device for aligning the optical center finder of an x-ray diagnostic apparatus]. Cherniĭ AN Med Tekh; 1985; (6):38-41. PubMed ID: 4094537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 1: Basic principles of x-ray production. Seibert JA J Nucl Med Technol; 2004 Sep; 32(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 15347692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]