These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5636557)

  • 1. Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning.
    Wagner AR; Logan FA; Haberlandt K; Price T
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Feb; 76(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 5636557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partial reinforcement effects in classical aversive conditioning in rabbits and human beings.
    Leonard DW
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1975 Feb; 88(2):596-608. PubMed ID: 1150940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Separate-phase differential eyelid conditioning within the context of a masking procedure.
    Homzie MJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Apr; 76(4):630-5. PubMed ID: 5650580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intertrial interval effects in classically conditioning fear to a discrete conditioned stimulus and to situational cues.
    McAllister WR; McAllister DE; Weldin GH
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 Sep; 87(3):582-90. PubMed ID: 4413952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential heart rate conditioning and lever lift suppression in restrained rabbits.
    Swadlow HA; Hosking KE; Schneiderman N
    Physiol Behav; 1971 Aug; 7(2):257-60. PubMed ID: 5148913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effect of cue stimulus in intermittent reinforcement training].
    Takenaka H; Iwamoto T; Kurata M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1967 Aug; 38(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 5625152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frustration considerations of the small-trials partial reinforcement effect: experience with nonreward and intertrial reinforcement.
    Brooks CI
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Aug; 89(2):362-71. PubMed ID: 5567141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of inconsistent reinforcement on reversal and nonreversal shifts.
    Mackintosh NJ; Holgate V
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jan; 76(1):154-9. PubMed ID: 5639694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. THE PARTIAL-REINFORCEMENT EFFECT SUSTAINED THROUGH BLOCKS OF CONTINUOUS REINFORCEMENT IN CLASSICAL EYELID CONDITIONING.
    PERRY SL; MOORE JW
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Feb; 69():158-61. PubMed ID: 14279772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Secondary reinforcement in children as a function of conditioning associations, extinction percentages, and stimulus types.
    MYERS JL; MYERS NA
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 May; 65():455-9. PubMed ID: 13936959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CONTRAST EFFECTS IN EXTINCTION RESPONDING AS A FUNCTION OF RESPONSE EFFORT DURING CONDITIONING.
    STACHNIK T
    J Psychol; 1965 Jul; 60():199-203. PubMed ID: 14326186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. REPEATED ACQUISITION AND EXTINCTION OF AN INSTRUMENTAL AVOIDANCE RESPONSE.
    JACOBS B
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1963 Dec; 56():1017-21. PubMed ID: 14100938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The course of Pavlovian excitation and inhibition of fear in rats.
    Weisman RG; Litner JS
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 Dec; 69(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 5359140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partial reinforcement effect under odor control.
    Prytula RE; Bridges CC; Anderson HR; Hayes LC
    Psychol Rep; 1972 Feb; 30(1):215-21. PubMed ID: 5012623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of partial reinforcement on discrimination learning and subsequent reversal or extinction.
    Pennes ES; Ison JR
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Jun; 74(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 6048460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classical conditioning after temporal lobe lesions in man: sparing of simple discrimination and extinction.
    Daum I; Channon S; Gray JA
    Behav Brain Res; 1992 Dec; 52(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 1294195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The truly random control procedure: conditioning to the static cues.
    Kremer EF
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 Apr; 86(4):700-7. PubMed ID: 4823243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RESPONSE FORCE AS A FUNCTION OF AMOUNT OF REINFORCEMENT.
    DILOLLO V; ENSMINGER WD; NOTTERMAN JM
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():27-31. PubMed ID: 14315127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for positive induction in discrimination learning.
    Senf GM; Miller NE
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1967 Aug; 64(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 6064414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. OPERANT DISCRIMINATION LEARNING IN HUMAN INFANTS.
    SIMMONS MW
    Child Dev; 1964 Sep; 35():737-48. PubMed ID: 14203810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.