These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5636790)

  • 1. Aural harmonics: preliminary time-intensity relationships using the tone-on-tone masking technique.
    Clack TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1968 Feb; 43(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 5636790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aural harmonics: the tone-on-tone masking vs. the best-beat method in normal and abnormal listeners.
    Clack TD; Bess FH
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1969 Apr; 67(4):399-412. PubMed ID: 5371323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].
    Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of noise bands on contralateral pure tone adaptation.
    Meyer RC; Schubert GW; Holzwarth HR
    Laryngoscope; 1975 Aug; 85(8):1367-73. PubMed ID: 1160467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency discrimination at 1200 Hz in the presence of high-frequency masking noise.
    Nelson DA; Stanton ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Mar; 71(3):660-4. PubMed ID: 7085971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectrotemporal analysis and cochlear hearing impairment: effects of frequency selectivity, temporal resolution, signal frequency, and rate of modulation.
    Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2550-62. PubMed ID: 2745879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Békesy's audiometry in the noisy environment of audio professional. auditory thresholds and the masking of noise in sound technicians with normal hearing].
    Tománek R
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1974 Feb; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 4452101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audiometry with nasally presented masking noise: novel diagnostic method for patulous eustachian tube.
    Hori Y; Kawase T; Hasegawa J; Sato T; Yoshida N; Oshima T; Suetake M; Kobayashi T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):596-9. PubMed ID: 16868507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masking effects in patients with auditory neuropathy-possible involvement of suppression mechanism caused by normal outer hair cell function.
    Oda K; Kawase T; Takata Y; Miyazaki H; Hidaka H; Kobayashi T
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jul; 34(5):868-76. PubMed ID: 23739557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
    Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noise-excluding enclosure for audiometry.
    Stark EW; Borton TE
    Audiology; 1975; 14(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 1131126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early detection of non-organic hearing loss using a simple tone-in-noise test.
    Rowan D; Morris O; Adewale M; Millgate A
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(59):179-83. PubMed ID: 22918148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.
    Kortlang S; Mauermann M; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Significance of the low tone test in the detection of probands sensitive to noise].
    Pfander F
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1987 Dec; 66(12):648-52. PubMed ID: 3431313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aural harmonics: estimation consistency from tone-on-tone masking measurements.
    Clack TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jun; 63(6):1941-3. PubMed ID: 681626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech.
    Liu C; Azimi B; Tahmina Q; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL378-84. PubMed ID: 23145698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of the validity of high-frequency audition.
    Fausti SA; Rappaport BZ; Schechter MA; Frey RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Mar; 71(3):646-9. PubMed ID: 7085969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.