These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods. Ross JW; Miller WG; Myers GL; Praestgaard J Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jul; 122(7):587-608. PubMed ID: 9674541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Twenty-five years of proficiency testing for clinical laboratories. Sunderman FW Ann Clin Lab Sci (1971); 1972; 2(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 4563231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluation of the precision and accuracy of clinical laboratories in determinations of clinical chemistry]. Gómez R; Sandoval S; Donoso E Rev Med Chil; 1986 Apr; 114(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 3809806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy verification and identification of matrix effects. The College of American Pathologists' Protocol. Eckfeldt JH; Copeland KR Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 8466401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality control in the clinical biology laboratory]. Mascart P Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1971; 29(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 5579077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Matrix effects and the accuracy of cholesterol analysis. Ross JW; Myers GL; Gilmore BF; Cooper GR; Naito HR; Eckfeldt J Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 8466403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The external quality assessment schemes in Thailand. Opartkiattikul N; Bejrachandra S Rinsho Byori; 2002 Feb; 50(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 11925846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proficiency testing and consensus evaluation. Bayse DD Med Instrum; 1974; 8(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 4812342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A revised scheme for the comparison of quantitative methods. Barnett RN; Youden WJ Am J Clin Pathol; 1970 Sep; 54(3):454-62. PubMed ID: 5459733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. College of American Pathologists Conference XXIII on matrix effects and accuracy assessment in clinical chemistry. Report of Working Group on Proficiency Test Scoring. Ross JW Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):425-6. PubMed ID: 8466408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Achieving accuracy for routine clinical chemistry methods by using patient specimen correlations to assign calibrator values. A means of managing matrix effects. Lasky FD Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):412-9. PubMed ID: 8466405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. College of American Pathologists Conference XXIII on matrix effects and accuracy assessment in clinical chemistry: report of Working Group on Method Development. Kaufman HW; Gochman N Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):427-8. PubMed ID: 8466409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Olympus AU 400 clinical chemistry analyzer. Bilić A; Alpeza I; Rukavina AS Clin Lab; 2000; 46(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10745974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proficiency testing of clinical chemistry laboratories: the role of the reference laboratory. Deming SN Clin Chem; 1991 Apr; 37(4):483. PubMed ID: 2015658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Surveys of the routine work of clinical chemical laboratories in 116 Scandinavian hospitals. Strömme JH; Eldjarn L Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1970 May; 25(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 5450675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Report on a common survey in clinical laboratories in Belgium and in The Netherlands: immunoassays. Libeer JC; Tertoolen JF Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1993; 212():39-42. PubMed ID: 8465152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]