These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5642143)

  • 21. Categorizing with gender: does implicit grammatical gender affect semantic processing in 24-month-old toddlers?
    Bobb SC; Mani N
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Jun; 115(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 23563160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semantic memory deterioration in Alzheimer's subjects: evidence from word association, definition, and associate ranking tasks.
    Abeysinghe SC; Bayles KA; Trosset MW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Sep; 33(3):574-82. PubMed ID: 2232774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ALTERNATE FORMS OF A SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL FOR MEASUREMENT OF CHANGES IN SELF-DESCRIPTION.
    AIKEN EG
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Feb; 16():177-8. PubMed ID: 14283956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The meaning and measurement of age identity.
    George LK; Mutran EJ; Pennybacker MR
    Exp Aging Res; 1980 Jun; 6(3):283-98. PubMed ID: 7398714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Semantic relevance, domain specificity and the sensory/functional theory of category-specificity.
    Sartori G; Gnoato F; Mariani I; Prioni S; Lombardi L
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):966-76. PubMed ID: 17069865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Concept typicality responses in the semantic memory network.
    Santi A; Raposo A; Frade S; Marques JF
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):167-175. PubMed ID: 27789333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Analysis by semantic differential of equivalent stimuli of the doctor concept].
    Liotti G; Guidano VF; Pancheri P
    Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr; 1971; 32(5):427-33. PubMed ID: 5145649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Congruency effects in conceptualizing for speech.
    Kuipers JR; La Heij W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2155-68. PubMed ID: 22630114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simplified use of the semantic differential to measure psychotherapy outcome.
    Morrison JK; Teta DC
    J Clin Psychol; 1978 Jul; 34(3):751-3. PubMed ID: 690221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Dual-Dialectical Conceptualization in Psychotherapy.
    Navon S
    Am J Psychother; 2015; 69(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 26241799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The representation of semantic categories in aging.
    Brosseau J; Cohen H
    Exp Aging Res; 1996; 22(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 8968709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of psychotherapies and Osgood's Semantic Differential. A tentative approach.
    Gilliéron E; Bovet J
    Psychother Psychosom; 1980; 33(1-2):46-58. PubMed ID: 7375626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The California Psychological Inventory and the Semantic Differential dimensions.
    Burger GK; Pickett L
    J Gen Psychol; 1976 Jan; 94(1st Half):129-34. PubMed ID: 943470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Non-semantic contributions to "semantic" redundancy gain.
    Shepherdson P; Miller J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1564-82. PubMed ID: 26339718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distinct progression of the deterioration of thematic and taxonomic links in natural and manufactured objects in Alzheimer's disease.
    Simoes Loureiro I; Lefebvre L
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():426-434. PubMed ID: 27614291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Osgood's semantic differential in psychopathology: a differential study].
    Abad Mateo MA; Morales Ortiz AM; Nieto Munuera J; Ortiz Zabala MM
    Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines; 1991; 19(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 1950697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Category, semantic field and naming in aphasics.
    Popovici M; Voinescu I; Lugoji G
    Neurol Psychiatr (Bucur); 1988; 26(3):153-69. PubMed ID: 3187365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Extremity of semantic differential ratings in deaf and hearing subjects.
    Chen KC
    J Gen Psychol; 1977 Apr; 96(2d Half):231-6. PubMed ID: 864438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Self-ratings on the semantic differential: content versus response set.
    Long BH; Henderson EH; Ziller RC
    Child Dev; 1968 Jun; 39(2):647-56. PubMed ID: 5649971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of interactional semantic patterns on the interpretation of noun-noun compounds.
    Maguire P; Maguire R; Cater AW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):288-97. PubMed ID: 20192532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.