These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5642282)
1. Possible interpretive problems in analyses using group means as the experimental unit. Fletcher HJ Psychol Bull; 1968 Mar; 69(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 5642282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Family interaction scales. I. Theoretical framework and method. Riskin J; Faunce EE Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1970 Jun; 22(6):504-12. PubMed ID: 5442482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. NOTE ON "THE COMPARISON OF GROUP PROFILES. RYDER RG J Consult Psychol; 1964 Apr; 28():179-80. PubMed ID: 14142953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of clinical accuracy ratings of interpretive approaches for adolescent MMPI responses. Ehrenworth NV; Archer RP J Pers Assess; 1985 Aug; 49(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 4045687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A study of the semantic structure of ratings of interpretive responses. HOWE ES J Consult Psychol; 1962 Jun; 26():285. PubMed ID: 14449391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A semantic differential scale for assessing group process changes. Hartley JA J Clin Psychol; 1968 Jan; 24(1):74. PubMed ID: 5639465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An approach to the quantitative problems of psychoanalytic research. Sargent HD; Coyne L; Wallerstein RS; Holtzman WH J Clin Psychol; 1967 Jul; 23(3):243-91. PubMed ID: 6082114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The focus in brief interpretive psychotherapy: dilemmas, traps and snags as target problems. Ryle A Br J Psychiatry; 1979 Jan; 134():46-54. PubMed ID: 760923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Matrix representation of models for the analysis of variance and covariance. RULON PJ Psychometrika; 1949 Dec; 14(4):259-78. PubMed ID: 24536418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [THE SELECTION OF THE ADEQUATE MEAN SQUARE AS AN ERROR TERM IN THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE]. VAN DER MEER HC Ned Tijdschr Psychol; 1964; 19():484-96. PubMed ID: 14228906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Group Personality Projective Test fakability: a re-examination. Braun JR J Clin Psychol; 1967 Jul; 23(3):389-91. PubMed ID: 4866662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigating moderator hypotheses in aging research: statistical, methodological, and conceptual difficulties with comparing separate regressions. Newsom JT; Prigerson HG; Schulz R; Reynolds CF Int J Aging Hum Dev; 2003; 57(2):119-50. PubMed ID: 15151187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]