These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5642400)

  • 1. An interative procedure for estimating fixed effects and variance components in mixed model situations.
    Cunnungham EP; Henderson CR
    Biometrics; 1968 Mar; 24(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 5642400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum likelihood estimation of variance components for a multivariate mixed model with equal design matrices.
    Meyer K
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 4005372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On identifiability of (co)variance components in animal models with competition effects.
    Cantet RJ; Cappa EP
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Dec; 125(6):371-81. PubMed ID: 19134072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Covariance analysis with unequal subclass numbers: component-estimation in quantitative genetics.
    Grossman M; Gall GA
    Biometrics; 1968 Mar; 24(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 5642409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some aspects of the statistical analysis of the 'mixed model'.
    Koch GG; Sen PK
    Biometrics; 1968 Mar; 24(1):27-48. PubMed ID: 5642408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple-trait Gibbs sampler for animal models: flexible programs for Bayesian and likelihood-based (co)variance component inference.
    Van Tassell CP; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2586-97. PubMed ID: 8923173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Illustration of the maternal animal model used for genetic evaluation of beef cattle.
    Crews DH; Wang Z
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1842-8. PubMed ID: 17371795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of beef cattle longitudinal data applying a nonlinear model.
    Forni S; Piles M; Blasco A; Varona L; Oliveira HN; Lôbo RB; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3189-97. PubMed ID: 17644784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are variance components of exposure heterogeneous between time periods and factories in the European carbon black industry?
    Van Tongeren M; Burstyn I; Kromhout H; Gardiner K
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jan; 50(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16126761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model comparison for genetic evaluation of milk yield in crossbred Holsteins in the tropics.
    Chanvijit K; Duangjinda M; Pattarajinda V; Reodecha C
    J Appl Genet; 2005; 46(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 16278512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some transformations of scale and the estimation of genetic parameters from daughter-dam regression.
    Quartermain AR; Freeman AE
    Biometrics; 1967 Dec; 23(4):823-34. PubMed ID: 5625092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of an insulin-like growth factor 1 gene microsatellite with phenotypic variation and estimated breeding values of growth traits in Canchim cattle.
    Andrade PC; Grossi DA; Paz CC; Alencar MM; Regitano LC; Munari DP
    Anim Genet; 2008 Oct; 39(5):480-5. PubMed ID: 18637878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. C. R. Henderson, the statistician; and his contributions to variance components estimation.
    Searle SR
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):4035-44. PubMed ID: 1757641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fertility traits in spring-calving Aberdeen Angus cattle. 2. Model comparison.
    Urioste JI; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):2861-5. PubMed ID: 17686900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of covariance in the mixed model: higher-level, nonhomogeneous, and random regressions.
    Henderson CR
    Biometrics; 1982 Sep; 38(3):623-40. PubMed ID: 7171692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic evaluation of Australian dairy cattle for somatic cell scores using multi-trait random regression test-day model.
    Konstantinov KV; Beard KT; Goddard ME; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Jun; 126(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19646149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of genetic parameters for average daily gain using models with competition effects.
    Chen CY; Kachman SD; Johnson RK; Newman S; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2525-30. PubMed ID: 18539840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Fitting a model for analysis of variance. Critical study on the paper by Etzler, Hoenle, Joswig, Köhler and Mallach: examination of the statistical interaction between ethyl alcohol and carbamazepine, methaqualone and nitrozepam].
    Rahlfs W; Bedall FK
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1971 Sep; 21(9):1411-4. PubMed ID: 5171800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating population or group sensitivity and its precision from a set of individual d'.
    Bi J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15969839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of covariance and standardization as instances of prediction.
    Lane PW; Nelder JA
    Biometrics; 1982 Sep; 38(3):613-21. PubMed ID: 7171691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.