These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5645213)

  • 1. Effect of massed practice on the comprehension of time-compressed speech.
    Orr DB; Friedman HL
    J Educ Psychol; 1968 Feb; 59(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 5645213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intelligibility of time-compressed CNC monosyllables.
    Beasley DS; Schwimmer S; Rintelmann WF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Jun; 15(2):340-50. PubMed ID: 5065455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The difficulty of listening to time-compressed speech.
    Zemlin WR; Daniloff RG; Shriner TH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Dec; 11(4):875-81. PubMed ID: 5719245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shifting attention between the ears.
    Treisman AM
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1971 May; 23(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 5559704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory assembly of non-prosodic sentences by children.
    Schill MJ; Schuckers GH
    J Commun Disord; 1973 Dec; 6(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 4785184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of time-compressed speech signals on children's identification accuracy and latency measures.
    Shriner TH; Sprague RL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1969 Jun; 7(3):532-40. PubMed ID: 5772482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tangible rewards in assessing auditory discrimination performance of mentally retarded children.
    Dahle AJ; Daly DA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1974 Mar; 78(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 4820212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds "L" and "R".
    Goto H
    Neuropsychologia; 1971 Sep; 9(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 5149302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-pacing behavior in the use of time-compressed speech.
    Orr DB; Friedman HL; Graae CN
    J Educ Psychol; 1969 Feb; 60(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 4180445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aphasic comprehension of time spacing.
    Sheehan JG; Aseltine S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1973 Dec; 16(4):650-7. PubMed ID: 4783803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of the duration of a silent interval in nonspeech stimuli: a test of the motor theory of speech perception.
    Baumrin JM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Jun; 17(2):294-309. PubMed ID: 4836047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting speech discrimination test difficulty.
    Kreul EJ; Bell DW; Nixon JC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Jun; 12(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 5808854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of electronically gated speech.
    Ellis L; Derbyshire AJ; Joseph ME
    Lang Speech; 1971; 14(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 5097638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory analysis of temporally distorted sentential approximations.
    Beasley DS; Shriner TH
    Audiology; 1973; 12(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 4722025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confusions in recognizing phonemes spoken by esophageal speakers III. Terminal consonants and clusters.
    Nichols AC
    J Commun Disord; 1977 Jun; 10(4):285-99. PubMed ID: 925192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brief storage of compressed digits.
    Holding DH; Foulke E; Heise RL
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 101(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 4759637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term retention of auditory sequences as a function of stimulus duration, interstimulus interval, and encoding technique.
    Miscik JG; Smith JM; Hamm NH; Deffenbacher KA; Brown EL
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):147-51. PubMed ID: 5083118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dichotic and diotic presentation of speeded speech.
    Gerber SE
    J Commun; 1968 Sep; 18(3):272-82. PubMed ID: 5681132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The delayed auditory feedback effect is a function of speech rate.
    Robinson GM
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Sep; 95(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 5070286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of prosody and syntactic markers in children's comprehension of spoken sentences.
    Lahey M
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Dec; 17(4):656-8. PubMed ID: 4444286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.