These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5648104)

  • 1. Direct comparison of subglottal and esophageal pressure during speech.
    Lieberman P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1968 May; 43(5):1157-64. PubMed ID: 5648104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term variation of subglottal pressure for expressive purposes in singing and stage speech: a preliminary investigation.
    Sundberg J; Elliot N; Gramming P; Nord L
    J Voice; 1993 Sep; 7(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 8353640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial validation of an indirect measure of subglottal pressure during vowels.
    Löfqvist A; Carlborg B; Kitzing P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Aug; 72(2):633-5. PubMed ID: 7119286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On subglottal formant analysis.
    Cranen B; Boves L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):734-46. PubMed ID: 3584682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Correlation between sound pressure and intra-thoracic pressure at onset of phonation].
    Klingholz F; Siegert C
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1972; 24(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 4670044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of subglottal air pressure during Hindi stop consonants.
    Dixit RP; Shipp T
    Phonetica; 1985; 42(2-3):53-77. PubMed ID: 4095165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subglottal pressure oscillations accompanying phonation.
    Sundberg J; Scherer R; Hess M; Müller F; Granqvist S
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):411-21. PubMed ID: 23809566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Physiological correlates of linguistic stress in French].
    Benguerel AP
    Phonetica; 1973; 27(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 4722666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glottal Adduction and Subglottal Pressure in Singing.
    Herbst CT; Hess M; Müller F; Švec JG; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2015 Jul; 29(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 25944295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Functional studies of pharyngoesophageal speech after laryngectomy].
    Mitrović M; Zeitler E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1968; 66(1):171-80. PubMed ID: 5705464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinear vocal fold dynamics resulting from asymmetric fluid loading on a two-mass model of speech.
    Erath BD; Zañartu M; Peterson SD; Plesniak MW
    Chaos; 2011 Sep; 21(3):033113. PubMed ID: 21974648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Esophageal seal is not the only consideration in supraglottic airway devices.
    Genzwuerker HV; Hinkelbein J
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jul; 107(1):344-5; author reply 345. PubMed ID: 18635510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tracheo-bronchial soft tissue and cartilage resonances in the subglottal acoustic input impedance.
    Lulich SM; Arsikere H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3436-46. PubMed ID: 26093432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electroglottography for laryngeal function assessment and speech analysis.
    Childers DG; Larar JN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1984 Dec; 31(12):807-17. PubMed ID: 6526406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Glottal source-vocal tract interaction.
    Koizumi T; Taniguchi S; Hiromitsu S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Nov; 78(5):1541-7. PubMed ID: 4067067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comments on the article: "Vocal intensity, subglottic pressure and air flow relationship in singers"].
    Schwabe F; Siegert C
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1973; 25(1):150-4. PubMed ID: 4700759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation analysis of the physiological factors controlling fundamental voice frequency.
    Atkinson JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jan; 63(1):211-22. PubMed ID: 632414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrasting glottal stops in Gimi.
    Lloyd JA; McBride S; McBride N; Kabazo
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1981; 33(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 7274912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relation between videofluoroscopy of the esophagus and the quality of esophageal speech.
    Fouquet ML; Gonçalves AJ; Behlau M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 19145085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive value of objective esophageal insufflation testing for acquisition of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Callaway E; Truelson JM; Wolf GT; Thomas-Kincaid L; Cannon S
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Jun; 102(6):704-8. PubMed ID: 1602920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.