These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5654949)
1. A note on the interpretation of the ridit as a quantile rank. Kantor S; Winkelstein W; Ibrahim MA Am J Epidemiol; 1968 May; 87(3):609-15. PubMed ID: 5654949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The relationship between Ridit analysis and rank sum test for one-way ordinal contingency table in medical research]. Wang L; Xia JL; Yu LL; Li CJ; Wang SZ Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 42(6):427-30. PubMed ID: 19035046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re "A further note on the interpretation of ridit analysis". Criqui MH Am J Epidemiol; 1978 Mar; 107(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 629264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. When to intervene: the magic number called ridit. Feld WS Health Care Strateg Manage; 1985 Jun; 3(6):22-4. PubMed ID: 10271805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A further note on the interpretation of ridit analysis. Selvin S Am J Epidemiol; 1977 Jan; 105(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 831461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A note on certain discrete mixed distributions. Cohen AC Biometrics; 1966 Sep; 22(3):566-72. PubMed ID: 5970556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ridit analysis on ordinal data. Sermeus W; Delesie L West J Nurs Res; 1996 Jun; 18(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 8693727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The true distributions of the range of rank totals in the two-way classification. Dunn-Rankin P; Wilcoxon F Psychometrika; 1966 Dec; 31(4):573-80. PubMed ID: 5232443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A note on the interpretation of n x 2 tables. EDWARDS JH Br J Prev Soc Med; 1958 Jul; 12(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 13572785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple imputation for cure rate quantile regression with censored data. Wu Y; Yin G Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 27479513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the interpretation of "mean +/- s". Several notes on an old misunderstanding. Jílek M Acta Univ Carol Med (Praha); 1988; 34(3-4):259-77. PubMed ID: 3273850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Why the p-value is significant. Pripp AH Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2015 Sep; 135(16):1462-4. PubMed ID: 26356458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Permutation tests: precision in estimating probability values. Johnston JE; Berry KJ; Mielke PW Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):915-20. PubMed ID: 18229545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistical pearls. III. The most likely interpretation. Harris PD Anesth Analg; 1976; 55(6):846-8. PubMed ID: 1033704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]